Institutions for Intuitive Man

dc.contributor.authorEngel, Christoph
dc.date.accessioned2010-09-22T19:35:44Z
dc.date.available2010-09-22T19:35:44Z
dc.date.issued2007en_US
dc.description.abstract"By its critics, the rational choice model is routinely accused of being unrealistic. One key objection has it that, for all nontrivial problems, calculating the best response is cognitively way too taxing, given the severe cognitive limitations of the human mind. If one confines the analysis to consciously controlled decision-making, this criticism is certainly warranted. But it ignores a second mental apparatus. Unlike conscious deliberation, this apparatus does not work serially but in parallel. It handles huge amounts of information in almost no time. It only is not consciously accessible. Only the end result is propelled back to consciousness as an intuition."en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10535/6364
dc.languageEnglishen_US
dc.publisher.workingpaperseriesMax Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods, Bonn, Germanyen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesPreprints of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods, 2007/12en_US
dc.subjectinstitutional designen_US
dc.subjectincentivesen_US
dc.subjectprisoner's dilemmaen_US
dc.subjectuncertaintyen_US
dc.subjectrational choice theoryen_US
dc.subjectdecision makingen_US
dc.subject.sectorTheoryen_US
dc.titleInstitutions for Intuitive Manen_US
dc.typeWorking Paperen_US
dc.type.methodologyTheoryen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
institutions and intuitive man.pdf
Size:
528.71 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Collections