Building Robustness to Disturbance: Governance in Southern African Peace Parks

dc.contributor.authorSchoon, Michael L.
dc.coverage.regionAfricaen_US
dc.date.accessioned2009-11-13T14:16:15Z
dc.date.available2009-11-13T14:16:15Z
dc.date.issued2008en_US
dc.description.abstract"Transboundary conservation has gained currency over the past decade as an effective means for achieving a wide array of goals ranging from improved biodiversity conservation to regional economic development to the promotion of peace between countries. Studies to analyze these competing claims oscillate between views of transboundary protected areas (TPBAs) as panaceas that can solve wide-ranging societal challenges in any type of setting to studies that view them as idiosyncratic entities with no generalizable traits, and few studies assess institutional arrangements for governance. This study, by contrast, uses 150 key informant interviews within two TBPAs in southern Africa the Kgalagadi Transfrontier Park in Botswana and South Africa and the Great Limpopo Transfrontier Park in Mozambique, South Africa, and Zimbabwe to address analytically how different governance structures of transboundary protected areas maintain robustness in response to various types of disturbance. "The insights arise from the fundamentally different institutional development paths of the two cases. This study argues that that the bottom-up institutional development and the slow, unforced evolution of governance in the Kgalagadi Transfrontier Park have allowed governing bodies to learn how to adapt and respond to transformations in the social-ecological system from an operational level. By contrast, institutional development in the Great Limpopo has struggled operationally due to the top-down imposition of the park on local-level communities and officials and the short time horizons permitted for goal attainment. However, top-down park formation has resulted in other accomplishments, primarily in bridging international boundaries. The central premise is that the national-level commitment to the Great Limpopo results in greater degrees of cooperation at a policy level than in a park that develops from the bottom-up. Such high levels of policy cooperation without parallel gains in operational cooperation have led to unexpected challenges in the Great Limpopo."en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10535/5173
dc.languageEnglishen_US
dc.publisher.workingpaperseriesIndiana Universityen_US
dc.subjectparksen_US
dc.subjectland tenure and useen_US
dc.subjectbiodiversityen_US
dc.subjectconservationen_US
dc.subjecteconomic developmenten_US
dc.subjecttransboundary disputesen_US
dc.subjectprotected areasen_US
dc.subjectgovernance and politicsen_US
dc.subject.sectorGeneral & Multiple Resourcesen_US
dc.subject.sectorGlobal Commonsen_US
dc.subject.sectorLand Tenure & Useen_US
dc.titleBuilding Robustness to Disturbance: Governance in Southern African Peace Parksen_US
dc.typeThesis or Dissertationen_US
dc.type.methodologyCase Studyen_US
dc.type.publishedunpublisheden_US
dc.type.thesistypePh.D Dissertationen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
out.pdf
Size:
9.41 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format