The Adaptive Decision-Making Process as a Tool for Integrated Natural Resource Management: Focus, Attitudes, and Approach

dc.contributor.authorLal, Padmaen_US
dc.contributor.authorLim-Applegate, Hazelen_US
dc.contributor.authorScoccimarro, Michelle C.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2009-07-31T14:58:46Z
dc.date.available2009-07-31T14:58:46Z
dc.date.issued2001en_US
dc.date.submitted2009-02-10en_US
dc.date.submitted2009-02-10en_US
dc.description.abstract"Integrated natural resource management (INRM) and its many closely related approaches are generally considered to be more effective than single-disciplinary approaches for managing the complex resource issues currently facing many countries. INRM approaches aim to integrate several disciplines and involve different stakeholders operating in their own subsystems across different spatial and temporal scales. These approaches focus on identifying management strategies for sustaining natural resource stocks and flows of goods and services as well as their underlying ecological processes. Changes in the behavior of consumers and producers and in the allocation of resources among uses, users, time, and space will be necessary to achieve sustainable development. To accomplish this, changes in focus, attitudes, and approaches to research and management will also be necessary. This paper argues that the key focus of INRM should not be the natural resource itself, but rather the interactions of humans with each other and with their natural environment, and the decisions they make about using and managing resources. Such decision-making processes aim to identify and implement action-oriented strategies and to apply economic and noneconomic instruments that motivate behavioral changes, allowing for different responses to various economic imperatives. This process should be guided by constructivist philosophy and supported by rigorous cross-disciplinary research and active stakeholder participation. It must be compatible with dialectic decision making to reflect the different views and objectives of the stakeholders, the presence of incomplete information, and, at times, the fact that researchers have only a poor understanding of the dynamics of subsystems and their interactions. There must also be iterative, regular monitoring and fine-tuning of the management strategies chosen. We prefer to call the entire process an adaptive decision-making process (ADMP). Here we propose a four-phase ADMP illustrated by projects in Fiji and Thailand, both of which are supported by the Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research. The role of research, researchers, and other stakeholders in the ADMP is also discussed."en_US
dc.identifier.citationjournalEcology and Societyen_US
dc.identifier.citationmonthDecemberen_US
dc.identifier.citationnumber2en_US
dc.identifier.citationvolume5en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10535/3233
dc.subjectadaptive systemsen_US
dc.subjectdecision makingen_US
dc.subjectmodelingen_US
dc.subjectintegrationen_US
dc.subjectnatural resourcesen_US
dc.subjectresource managementen_US
dc.subject.sectorSocial Organizationen_US
dc.subject.sectorTheoryen_US
dc.titleThe Adaptive Decision-Making Process as a Tool for Integrated Natural Resource Management: Focus, Attitudes, and Approachen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.type.publishedpublisheden_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
http___www.ecologyandsociety.org_vol5_iss2_art11_.pdf
Size:
142.67 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Collections