Uncertainty in Forest Net Present Value Estimations

dc.contributor.authorHolopainen, Markus
dc.contributor.authorMäkinen, Antti
dc.contributor.authorRasinmäki, Jussi
dc.contributor.authorHyytiäinen, Kari
dc.contributor.authorBayazidi, Saeed
dc.contributor.authorVastaranta, Mikko
dc.contributor.authorPietilä, Ilona
dc.date.accessioned2011-01-14T15:14:03Z
dc.date.available2011-01-14T15:14:03Z
dc.date.issued2010en_US
dc.description.abstract"Uncertainty related to inventory data, growth models and timber price fluctuation was investigated in the assessment of forest property net present value (NPV). The degree of uncertainty associated with inventory data was obtained from previous area-based airborne laser scanning (ALS) inventory studies. The study was performed, applying the Monte Carlo simulation, using stand-level growth and yield projection models and three alternative rates of interest (3, 4 and 5%). Timber price fluctuation was portrayed with geometric mean-reverting (GMR) price models. The analysis was conducted for four alternative forest properties having varying compartment structures: (A) a property having an even development class distribution, (B) sapling stands, (C) young thinning stands, and (D) mature stands. Simulations resulted in predicted yield value (predicted NPV) distributions at both stand and property levels. Our results showed that ALS inventory errors were the most prominent source of uncertainty, leading to a 5.1–7.5% relative deviation of property-level NPV when an interest rate of 3% was applied. Interestingly, ALS inventory led to significant biases at the property level, ranging from 8.9% to 14.1% (3% interest rate). ALS inventory-based bias was the most significant in mature stand properties. Errors related to the growth predictions led to a relative standard deviation in NPV, varying from 1.5% to 4.1%. Growth model-related uncertainty was most significant in sapling stand properties. Timber price fluctuation caused the relative standard deviations ranged from 3.4% to 6.4% (3% interest rate). The combined relative variation caused by inventory errors, growth model errors and timber price fluctuation varied, depending on the property type and applied rates of interest, from 6.4% to 12.6%. By applying the methodology described here, one may take into account the effects of various uncertainty factors in the prediction of forest yield value and to supply the output results with levels of confidence."en_US
dc.identifier.citationjournalForestsen_US
dc.identifier.citationpages177-193en_US
dc.identifier.citationvolume1en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10535/6788
dc.languageEnglishen_US
dc.subjectuncertaintyen_US
dc.subjectforestsen_US
dc.subjectforest managementen_US
dc.subjectsimulationsen_US
dc.subject.sectorForestryen_US
dc.titleUncertainty in Forest Net Present Value Estimationsen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.type.methodologyCase Studyen_US
dc.type.publishedpublisheden_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Uncertainty in Forest Net Present Value Estimations.pdf
Size:
149.9 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Collections