The Reintegration of Political Science and Economics and the Presumed Imperialism of Economic Theory

dc.contributor.authorOrdeshook, Peter C.
dc.date.accessioned2010-06-11T14:51:36Z
dc.date.available2010-06-11T14:51:36Z
dc.date.issued1987en_US
dc.description.abstract"No discipline can claim a greater impact on contemporary political theorizing than that of economics, whether that theorizing concerns the study of legislatures, elections, international affairs, or judicial processes. This essay questions, however, whether this impact is a form of 'economic imperialism,' or the logical development of two disciplines whose artificial separation in the first part of this century merely allowed the development and refinement of the rational choice paradigm, unencumbered by the necessity for considering all of reality. Indeed, applications to specific substantive political matters -- most notably collective and cooperative processes where game theory proves most relevant -- reveal the paradigm's incompleteness. These applications, however, illuminate the necessary theoretical extensions, which is no longer the sole domain of the economist."en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10535/5844
dc.languageEnglishen_US
dc.publisher.workingpaperseriesCalifornia Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CAen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesSocial Science Working Papers, no. 655en_US
dc.subjecteconomic theoryen_US
dc.subjectpolitical scienceen_US
dc.subjectrational choice theoryen_US
dc.subjectparadigmen_US
dc.subject.sectorTheoryen_US
dc.titleThe Reintegration of Political Science and Economics and the Presumed Imperialism of Economic Theoryen_US
dc.typeWorking Paperen_US
dc.type.methodologyTheoryen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
The reintegration of political sacience and economics.pdf
Size:
238.12 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Collections