Beyond Environmental Policy Impacts: Joint-Efforts on Improving the Effectiveness of Pasture Management in Northwest China

dc.contributor.authorGubo, Qi
dc.contributor.authorFengyang, Li
dc.contributor.authorZhipu, Long
dc.contributor.authorLixia, Tang
dc.contributor.authorXiuli, Xu
dc.coverage.countryChinaen_US
dc.coverage.regionEast Asiaen_US
dc.date.accessioned2011-04-07T16:40:17Z
dc.date.available2011-04-07T16:40:17Z
dc.date.issued2011en_US
dc.description.abstract"Environmental degradation showed its most serious situation in the ecotones of farming and grazing in Northwest China, which had both significant negative impacts on local people’s livelihood and inevitable damage on living conditions of habitants in other areas. Corresponding to the environmental problems, the government implemented several environmental protection policies, including the extreme policy of grazing ban. At the same time, farmers living in this area coped with the hash environment and the enforced policies simultaneously. What are mutual interests between macro environmental policy makers and local people? What are the impacts of those policies on the pasture management effectiveness? How did policy maker, the farmer, other policy implementer, and other stakeholders develop an adaptive mechanism of pasture management during their interaction on Grazing Ban policy implementation? This article explored to answer those questions through a tracing study among 2001-2009, when grazing ban policy and relevant policies were implemented in Yanchi County, Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region in China, which is located in the middle part of the ecotone of cropping and grazing in Southwest China. This article found that the interaction among stakeholders in policy implementation and the farmers’ coping strategy on external institutions formatted the art of pasture management, which could not be discussed only through policy impacts assessment. With the analysis of farmers’ correspondences and adjustment of their livelihood strategy while implementing policies, it was found that furtive grazing was used effectively by the farmers and their community in balancing environmental protection and livelihood development, when the policy makers tried to internalize the external costs and benefits of using grassland through policy of grazing ban. Furthermore, for a more sustained application of pastureland, the facilitated interactions and induced joint-efforts of the government departments, relevant NGOs and community people could make more effective pasture management."en_US
dc.identifier.citationconfdatesJanuary 10-14en_US
dc.identifier.citationconferenceSustaining Commons: Sustaining Our Future, the Thirteenth Biennial Conference of the International Association for the Study of the Commonsen_US
dc.identifier.citationconflocHyderabad, Indiaen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10535/7187
dc.languageEnglishen_US
dc.subjectpastoralismen_US
dc.subjectresource managementen_US
dc.subjectgrazingen_US
dc.subject.sectorGrazingen_US
dc.titleBeyond Environmental Policy Impacts: Joint-Efforts on Improving the Effectiveness of Pasture Management in Northwest Chinaen_US
dc.typeConference Paperen_US
dc.type.methodologyCase Studyen_US
dc.type.publishedunpublisheden_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
708.pdf
Size:
95.25 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Collections