Socially Responsible Commercial Property Entities and the Allocation of Cultural Space

dc.contributor.authorKimmet, Philipen_US
dc.coverage.countryAustraliaen_US
dc.coverage.regionPacific and Australiaen_US
dc.date.accessioned2009-07-31T14:38:53Z
dc.date.available2009-07-31T14:38:53Z
dc.date.issued2003en_US
dc.date.submitted2007-07-08en_US
dc.date.submitted2007-07-08en_US
dc.description.abstract"When we talk about traditional or indigenous land use and economy, seldom do we think of the contemporary corporate and administrative jungle we call the central business district. Nevertheless, the built environment of our city centres are a great place to start rekindling our cultural past for several reasons. They have a high profile, their frequented, worked-in, and increasingly lived in by local populations and tourists, they are highly accessible and are destinations in their own right, and they are strong identity builders. Above all, CBDs are hives of commercial activity, and this has implications for the new 'corporate social responsibility.' This ethos, which many CEOs and government ministers are beginning to subscribe to, is impacting on the way commercial buildings in particular are designed, marketed and managed. This has given rise to the notion of 'socially responsible commercial property entities' (SRCPEs). However, much is unclear about what this term might mean for our cityscapes, and the original and current inhabitants in particular. This paper aims to demystify the term, and argues that despite the importance placed on the protection of private property rights, the notion of SRCPE can help to bring society, culture and history back into corporate and public administration calculations. In other words, making the community a meaningful stakeholder arguably forfeits certain property rights that have conventionally been vested within private domains. Releasing ground floor space for cultural purposes for instance would be a significant step toward returning cityspace to traditional custodians. In the very least, the emergence of SRCPE inspired social metrics should help to make these often alienating places a little more culturally sensitive and user friendly."en_US
dc.identifier.citationconfdatesSeptember 7-9, 2003en_US
dc.identifier.citationconferenceTraditional Lands in the Pacific Region: Indigenous Common Property Resources in Convulsion or Cohesionen_US
dc.identifier.citationconflocBrisbane, Australiaen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10535/1702
dc.languageEnglishen_US
dc.subjectIASCen_US
dc.subjecturban affairs--case studiesen_US
dc.subjectbusiness and financeen_US
dc.subjectpublic administrationen_US
dc.subjectproperty rightsen_US
dc.subjectcultureen_US
dc.subjectindigenous institutionsen_US
dc.subject.sectorSocial Organizationen_US
dc.subject.sectorUrban Commonsen_US
dc.submitter.emaillwisen@indiana.eduen_US
dc.titleSocially Responsible Commercial Property Entities and the Allocation of Cultural Spaceen_US
dc.typeConference Paperen_US
dc.type.publishedunpublisheden_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
kimmet_-SRCPE_and_space.pdf
Size:
172.74 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Collections