Platforms for Collective Action in Multiple-Use CPRs

dc.contributor.authorSteins, Nathalie A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorEdwards, Victoria M.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2009-07-31T14:28:01Z
dc.date.available2009-07-31T14:28:01Z
dc.date.issued1998en_US
dc.date.submitted2007-07-16en_US
dc.date.submitted2007-07-16en_US
dc.description.abstract"Collective action processes in complex, multiple use common-pool resources (CPRs) have only recently become a focus of study. When CPRs evolve into more complex systems, resource use by separate user groups becomes increasingly interdependent. This implies, amongst others, that the institutional framework governing resource use has to be re-negotiated to avoid adverse impacts associated with the increased access of any new stakeholders, such as overexploitation, alienation of traditional users and inter-user conflicts. "World-wide experiences in the field of extension science suggest that the establishment of 'platforms for resource use negotiation' is a way of dealing with complex natural resource management problems. A platform is defined as a decision-making body (voluntary or statutory) comprising different stakeholders who perceive the same resource management problem, realise their interdependence for solving it, and come together to agree on action strategies for solving the problem (Roling, 1994). "This paper sets the scene for panel discussion on the potential of local platforms for resource use negotiation in facilitating collective action in the management of complex, multiple use CPRs. The paper has five objectives. First, we identify what we mean by 'collective action' in the context of this paper. Second, we discuss the importance of collective action in complex, multiple use CPRs. Third, we introduce the concept of 'platforms for resource use negotiation' to co-ordinate collective action by multiple users. Fourth, we address a number of issues that emerge from evidence in the field regarding the role and potential of local platforms in the management of complex, multiple-use CPRs. Finally, we raise five discussion statements related to the effectiveness of local platforms to co-ordinate collective action in complex, multiple-use scenarios. The latter will form the basis for the panel discussion."en_US
dc.identifier.citationconfdatesJune 10-14, 1998en_US
dc.identifier.citationconferenceCrossing Boundaries, the Seventh Biennial Conference of the International Association for the Study of Common Propertyen_US
dc.identifier.citationconflocVancouver, British Columbia, Canadaen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10535/115
dc.languageEnglishen_US
dc.subjectIASCen_US
dc.subjectcommon pool resources--theoryen_US
dc.subjectcollective actionen_US
dc.subjectmultiple useen_US
dc.subjectnegotiationen_US
dc.subjectcomplexityen_US
dc.subjectrulesen_US
dc.subject.sectorTheoryen_US
dc.subject.sectorGeneral & Multiple Resourcesen_US
dc.submitter.emaillwisen@indiana.eduen_US
dc.titlePlatforms for Collective Action in Multiple-Use CPRsen_US
dc.typeConference Paperen_US
dc.type.publishedunpublisheden_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
STEINS98.pdf
Size:
70.98 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Collections