Why is There No Unified Theory of Environmental Governance?
Loading...
Date
2002
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Abstract
"Those who work on the role of institutions as determinants of the course of human/environment relations have much in common. They employ compatible perspectives on the nature of institutions, subscribe to the main tenets of the 'new institutionalism' in the social sciences, and seek to understand the roles that institutions play both in causing and confronting environmental problems. Yet this common agenda has not led to the emergence of a vibrant and mutually beneficial dialogue among those focusing on smallscale systems and approaching these issues from a bottom-up perspective and those examining macro-level systems and considering the issues from a top-down perspective. In this essay, I seek both to explain the reasons for this failure to engage in a lively dialogue and to offer some suggestions for overcoming this problem. I locate the causes of the problem in divergent research strategies, conceptual fixations, and conflicting methodological practices. Overcoming the resultant disconnect will not be easy. But I advocate a strategy featuring an emphasis on common questions and a commitment to common activities as a promising approach for those who believe that bridging the gap between bottom-up and top-down studies is both feasible and desirable."
Description
Keywords
IASC, common pool resources, institutional analysis, tragedy of the commons, Ostrom, Elinor, global commons