Uncovered Sets and Sophisticated Voting Outcomes with Implications for Agenda Institutions

dc.contributor.authorShepsle, Kenneth A.
dc.contributor.authorWeingast, Barry R.
dc.date.accessioned2010-02-02T17:29:07Z
dc.date.available2010-02-02T17:29:07Z
dc.date.issued1981en_US
dc.description.abstract"This paper examines the properties of majority-rule institutions given fully strategic behavior by all agents. Results are provided, characterizing majority-rule outcomes, for several alternative agenda institutions. The main conclusion is that institutional arrangements, specifically mechanisms of agenda construction, impose constraints on majority outcomes. In the last decade multidimensional voting models have become subtle and complex instruments for explicating social choices by majority rule. What has been learned from them is that little will be known about an institution based on majority rule if the focus is exclusively upon the majority preference relation between alternatives."en_US
dc.identifier.citationconfdates1981en_US
dc.identifier.citationconferenceAnnual Meeting of the American Political Science Associationen_US
dc.identifier.citationconflocNew Yorken_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10535/5473
dc.languageEnglishen_US
dc.subjectvotingen_US
dc.subjectmajority ruleen_US
dc.subject.sectorSocial Organizationen_US
dc.titleUncovered Sets and Sophisticated Voting Outcomes with Implications for Agenda Institutionsen_US
dc.typeConference Paperen_US
dc.type.methodologyCase Studyen_US
dc.type.publishedunpublisheden_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Uncovered sets and sophisticated Voting Outcomes with Implications for Agenda Institutions.pdf
Size:
504.36 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Collections