On the Nature of Keystone Species: A response to: Khanina. 1998. 'Determining Keystone Species'

dc.contributor.authorVanclay, Jerome K.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2009-07-31T14:51:15Z
dc.date.available2009-07-31T14:51:15Z
dc.date.issued1999en_US
dc.date.submitted2008-11-04en_US
dc.date.submitted2008-11-04en_US
dc.description.abstract"There is an unfortunate tendency to nominate large and conspicuous creatures as likely keystone species playing pivotal roles in ecosystems. Particular favorites in the tropics include fig trees (Ficus spp.), large apes, and colorful birds, but such claims are rarely supported by empirical evidence. Khanina (1998) follows this trend, suggesting that 'only trees can be considered as keystone species of forest communities (detritus ecosystems).'"en_US
dc.identifier.citationjournalEcology and Societyen_US
dc.identifier.citationmonthJuneen_US
dc.identifier.citationnumber1en_US
dc.identifier.citationvolume3en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10535/2555
dc.subjectecologyen_US
dc.subject.sectorSocial Organizationen_US
dc.titleOn the Nature of Keystone Species: A response to: Khanina. 1998. 'Determining Keystone Species'en_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.type.publishedpublisheden_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
30.pdf
Size:
95.26 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Collections