Should Sustainability and Resilience be Combined or Remain Distinct Pursuits

dc.contributor.authorRedman, Charles L.
dc.date.accessioned2014-08-12T19:13:57Z
dc.date.available2014-08-12T19:13:57Z
dc.date.issued2014en_US
dc.description.abstract"It has become common for sustainability science and resilience theory to be considered as complementary approaches. Occasionally the terms have been used interchangeably. Although these two approaches share some working principles and objectives, they also are based on some distinct assumptions about the operation of systems and how we can best guide these systems into the future. Each approach would benefit from some scholars keeping sustainability science and resilience theory separate and focusing on further developing their distinctiveness and other scholars continuing to explore them in combination. Three areas of research in which following different procedures might be beneficial are whether to prioritize outcomes or system dynamics, how best to take advantage of community input, and increasing the use of knowledge of the past as a laboratory for potential innovations."en_US
dc.identifier.citationjournalEcology and Societyen_US
dc.identifier.citationmonthJuneen_US
dc.identifier.citationnumber2en_US
dc.identifier.citationvolume19en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10535/9490
dc.languageEnglishen_US
dc.subjectadaptationen_US
dc.subjectresilienceen_US
dc.subjectadaptive systemsen_US
dc.subjectsustainabilityen_US
dc.subject.sectorGeneral & Multiple Resourcesen_US
dc.titleShould Sustainability and Resilience be Combined or Remain Distinct Pursuitsen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.type.methodologyTheoryen_US
dc.type.publishedpublisheden_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
ES-2013-6390.pdf
Size:
109.88 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Collections