Management Alternatives for the Commonlands of Iberian Peninsula: A Multi-Criteria Stakeholders Perspective

dc.contributor.authorLopes, J. R.en_US
dc.coverage.countryPortugalen_US
dc.coverage.regionEuropeen_US
dc.date.accessioned2009-07-31T14:36:21Z
dc.date.available2009-07-31T14:36:21Z
dc.date.issued2008en_US
dc.date.submitted2008-10-24en_US
dc.date.submitted2008-10-24en_US
dc.description.abstract"Communal lands occupy approximately 1 million ha in NW Iberian Peninsula (400000 in north Portugal and 600000 in Galicia), with high average areas (circa 500 ha in Portugal and 200 ha in Galicia), and are owned by approximately 2900 communities in Galicia and 1000 in north Portugal. During centuries, <i>baldios </i>(Portugal) and <i>Montes Veciñais en Man Común </i>(MVMC, Galicia) played an essential role in the rural economy of their owner communities. This role was lost during the twentieth century due to the massive forestation and the decline of agriculture prominence. The restoration of democratic regimes in both countries returned the <i>baldios </i>and MVMC to their owner communities, now declining, aging, disrupted and disorganized. The multifunctional character of the use of commonlands and the involvement of multiple users and stakeholders, results in complex and uncertain management practices. Thus, their evaluation must be carried out with a methodology capable of assessing contradictory objectives and difficult to quantify and compare. The paper describes the use of a multiple criteria decision aid technique as decision tool for assessing criteria and indicators designed to evaluate management alternatives for the communal lands. The methods are highly transparent, easy to understand, and offer a convenient environment for participatory evaluation processes. This exercise aimed to build an approach to the knowledge of the overall factors evolved in the situation. The results show that current management modalities are not satisfactory in the stakeholders point of view. The preferred management alternative by most of the stakeholder groups was a theoretical (currently non-existent) management model where the communities and the Administration are co-managers in a parity relationship, and have professional managers. The results also highlight the fact that there is no valuable decision that doesn't take into account the incorporation of stakeholders desires, knowledge and preferences."en_US
dc.identifier.citationconfdatesJuly 14-18, 2008en_US
dc.identifier.citationconferenceGoverning Shared Resources: Connecting Local Experience to Global Challenges, the Twelfth Biennial Conference of the International Association for the Study of Commonsen_US
dc.identifier.citationconflocCheltenham, Englanden_US
dc.identifier.citationmonthJulyen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10535/1376
dc.subjectdecision makingen_US
dc.subjectland tenure and useen_US
dc.subjectlocal participatory managementen_US
dc.subjectco-managementen_US
dc.subjectstakeholdersen_US
dc.subject.sectorLand Tenure & Useen_US
dc.subject.sectorSocial Organizationen_US
dc.submitter.emailelsa_jin@yahoo.comen_US
dc.titleManagement Alternatives for the Commonlands of Iberian Peninsula: A Multi-Criteria Stakeholders Perspectiveen_US
dc.typeConference Paperen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Lopes_213301.pdf
Size:
125.43 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Collections