Discourse and Realities Around Common Property Resources: Putting the Wise Use Movement in Its Place

dc.contributor.authorRangan, Haripriyaen_US
dc.contributor.authorBode, Brigittaen_US
dc.coverage.countryUnited States, Indiaen_US
dc.coverage.regionMiddle East & South Asiaen_US
dc.coverage.regionNorth Americaen_US
dc.date.accessioned2009-07-31T14:42:24Z
dc.date.available2009-07-31T14:42:24Z
dc.date.issued1996en_US
dc.date.submitted2008-02-21en_US
dc.date.submitted2008-02-21en_US
dc.description.abstract"The past decade has seen substantial focusing of attention on conflicts between 'civil society' and the 'state' over issues of natural resource management. In most cases the discourse around resource management issues center around ideas of sustainability, property regimes, and how particular forms of property regimes are more likely to result in sustainable natural resource management practices. This paper will argue that the discourses around common property regimes place excessive emphasis on definitions and typologies of property and ownership and in so doing, ignore looking at the actual terrain of conflict and contention -- that is to say, the battles over the very processes by which access to resources are controlled and regulated by various state and communal institutions. This paper will engage in a comparative analysis of conflicts over management of common property resources (used in the broadest sense to include public and state owned lands/resources) in the western United States and northern India. By comparing cases of natural resource-related conflicts between state institutions and 'civil society' such as the Chipko movement, the Jharkhand movement in India and the Wise Use and Property Rights movements in the U.S., the paper will explore the political ecology of environmental legislation, conservation, set-asides, and other regulations that have curbed local access to public lands and production-oriented use of resources within them. The paper will also analyze the regional economic context, declining government supports and subsidies to local communities, growing unemployment, and lack of alternative economic opportunities in these regions where conflicts over access to common property resources is particularly intense. We argue that focusing on issues of how controls over access are exercised would provide a more useful approach for addressing these conflicts as well as developing alternative approaches to sustainable management of common property resources."en_US
dc.identifier.citationconfdatesJune 5-8, 1996en_US
dc.identifier.citationconferenceVoices from the Commons, the Sixth Biennial Conference of the International Association for the Study of Common Propertyen_US
dc.identifier.citationconflocBerkeley, CAen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10535/2103
dc.subjectIASCen_US
dc.subjectcommon pool resourcesen_US
dc.subjectland tenure and useen_US
dc.subjectforestryen_US
dc.subject.sectorLand Tenure & Useen_US
dc.subject.sectorForestryen_US
dc.submitter.emailefcastle@indiana.eduen_US
dc.titleDiscourse and Realities Around Common Property Resources: Putting the Wise Use Movement in Its Placeen_US
dc.typeConference Paperen_US
dc.type.publishedunpublisheden_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Discourse_and_Realities_Around_Common_Property_Resources_Putting_the_Wise_Use_Movement_in_Its_Place.pdf
Size:
990.23 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Collections