Applying Elinor Ostrom’s Design Principles to Guide Co-Design in Health(care) Improvement: A Case Study with Citizens Returning to the Community from Jail in Los Angeles County

dc.contributor.authorRobert, Glenn
dc.contributor.authorWilliams, Oli
dc.contributor.authorLindenfalk, Bertil
dc.contributor.authorMendel, Peter
dc.contributor.authorDavis, Lois
dc.contributor.authorTurner, Susan
dc.contributor.authorFarmer, Cedric
dc.contributor.authorBranch, Cheryl
dc.coverage.countryUnited Kingdomen_US
dc.coverage.regionEuropeen_US
dc.date.accessioned2024-02-22T19:54:38Z
dc.date.available2024-02-22T19:54:38Z
dc.date.issued2021en_US
dc.description.abstract"Increased interest in collaborative and inclusive approaches to healthcare improvement makes revisiting Elinor Ostrom’s ‘design principles’ for enabling collective management of common pool resources (CPR) in polycentric systems a timely endeavour. Ostrom proposed a generalisable set of eight core design principles for the efficacy of groups. To consider the utility of Ostrom’s principles for the planning, delivery, and evaluation of future health(care) improvement we retrospectively apply them to a recent co-design project. Three distinct aspects of co-design were identified through consideration of the principles. These related to: (1) understanding and mapping the system (2) upholding democratic values and (3) regulating participation. Within these aspects four of Ostrom’s eight principles were inherently observed. Consideration of the remaining four principles could have enhanced the systemic impact of the co-design process. Reconceptualising co-design through the lens of CPR offers new insights into the successful system-wide application of such approaches for the purpose of health(care) improvement. The eight design principles – and the relationships between them – form a heuristic that can support the planning, delivery, and evaluation of future healthcare improvement projects adopting co-design. They may help to address questions of how to scale up and embed such approaches as self-sustaining in wider systems.en_US
dc.identifier.citationjournalInternational Journal of Integrated Careen_US
dc.identifier.citationnumber1en_US
dc.identifier.citationpages1-15en_US
dc.identifier.citationvolume21en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10535/10915
dc.languageEnglishen_US
dc.publisher.workingpaperseriesKing's College London, United Kingdomen_US
dc.subjectCase studyen_US
dc.subjectResearchen_US
dc.subjectTheoryen_US
dc.subject.classificationSociologyen_US
dc.subject.sectorSocial Organizationen_US
dc.titleApplying Elinor Ostrom’s Design Principles to Guide Co-Design in Health(care) Improvement: A Case Study with Citizens Returning to the Community from Jail in Los Angeles Countyen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.type.methodologyCase Studyen_US
dc.type.publishedpublisheden_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Robert LA case study.pdf
Size:
912.76 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Main article

Collections