Decentralisation and Natural Resource Management in Rural South Africa: Problems and Prospects

dc.contributor.authorNtsebeza, Lungisileen_US
dc.coverage.countrySouth Africaen_US
dc.coverage.regionAfricaen_US
dc.date.accessioned2009-07-31T14:36:06Z
dc.date.available2009-07-31T14:36:06Z
dc.date.issued2002en_US
dc.date.submitted2002-11-07en_US
dc.date.submitted2002-11-07en_US
dc.description.abstract"One of the aims of decentralization is to increase public participation in local-decision making. The claim is that public participation, coupled with locally accountable representatives with real public powers will increase efficiency and equity in the use of public resources (Agrawal and Ribot 1999). Since the advent of democracy in 1994, South Africa has embarked on its own version of decentralization in a range of areas. For example, the White Paper on Sustainable Forest Development in South Africa describes the category of 'community forestry' as 'implemented by, or with the participation of, communities.' (Department of Water Affairs and Forestry 1997:20). With regard to the environmental management policy, the National Environmental Management Act of 1998 advocates a strong role for civil society participation in environmental governance (see also Turner and Meer 1999:12). In this paper, the issue of decentralization and natural resource management will be interrogated primarily through a focus on local government reform and land administration. This focus illuminates problems that are on the horizon for other natural resources, such as forests, wildlife and fisheries, especially as these latter resources are to be managed through similar structures that are being constructed and contested in the local government and land policy arenas. Within this context, the role of traditional authorities (chiefs of various ranks) and municipal councillors will be assessed.... "The focus of this paper is on the institutional arrangements that have been put in place to give effect to decentralization and its impact on natural resource management in the rural areas of the old Transkei, South Africa. The paper will pay attention to the various actors who hold power over natural resources, the kinds of powers they hold, the degree of community participation and accountability relations and mechanisms of accountability to which these actors are subject. Of critical importance will be a discussion of the role of traditional authorities in post-1994 South Africa, particularly how they have responded current policies and laws. At the heart of the discussion will be an assessment of the relationship between theory and practice and implications for natural resource management."en_US
dc.identifier.citationconfdatesJune 17-21, 2002en_US
dc.identifier.citationconferenceThe Commons in an Age of Globalisation, the Ninth Biennial Conference of the International Association for the Study of Common Propertyen_US
dc.identifier.citationconflocVictoria Falls, Zimbabween_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10535/1345
dc.languageEnglishen_US
dc.subjectIASCen_US
dc.subjectcommon pool resourcesen_US
dc.subjectdecentralizationen_US
dc.subjectlocal governance and politicsen_US
dc.subjectresource managementen_US
dc.subjectcommunity participationen_US
dc.subjectinstitutional analysisen_US
dc.subjectlawen_US
dc.subject.sectorGeneral & Multiple Resourcesen_US
dc.subject.sectorSocial Organizationen_US
dc.submitter.emailmfragnol@indiana.eduen_US
dc.titleDecentralisation and Natural Resource Management in Rural South Africa: Problems and Prospectsen_US
dc.typeConference Paperen_US
dc.type.publishedunpublisheden_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
ntsebezal290502.pdf
Size:
221.99 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Collections