Transfiguration of Community: Surviving of Commons in Navarra (Spain), 18th-20th Centuries

dc.contributor.authorLana Berasain, Jose Miguelen_US
dc.coverage.countrySpainen_US
dc.coverage.regionEuropeen_US
dc.date.accessioned2009-07-31T14:43:31Z
dc.date.available2009-07-31T14:43:31Z
dc.date.issued2006en_US
dc.date.submitted2006-05-16en_US
dc.date.submitted2006-05-16en_US
dc.description.abstract"My purpose with this paper is to show a historical case study of management of commons and their surviving and transformation through the Liberal Revolution (18th- 19th centuries). "The paper will be divided in three parts. First, I will characterize the commons of the region and their management from 15th to 18th centuries. I will try to fit in with the set of questions published by De Moor, Shaw- Taylor & Warde (The management of common land in north west Europe, c.1500-1850, Turnhout, 2002: 23-30): outline of the resources (topography, environments and agrarian economy of the region), identity and rights of users (commoners), and finally institutions that connected both resources and users. Secondly, I will describe the push for the dissolution of the commons in this region in the 19th century. This episode, part of a wider movement covering Europe and America (Vid. M.D.Demelas & N.Vivier, eds.: Les proprietas collectives face aux attaques liberals, 1750-1914, Rennes, 2003), had some regional peculiarities. It began with the collapse of the Hispanic State in 1808, and it was generalized by the Desamortizacion Law in 1855. Thirdly, I will examine some distinctive features that are out of place with the known scheme of the triumph of the complete and perfect concept of (private) property. I will argue that these features are not residual and irrelevant. On the contrary, I will defend that these 'anomalies' express the complex nature of the social change that happened between 1790 and 1900. Moreover, I will defend that these facts reveal the adaptability of community bonds despite their supposed decline. "In short, we have here an example of the strength of common property and the adaptability of community bonds to changing circumstances. This was possible because the agents (users, owners, State, residents, etc) changed (or tried to do it) the institutions and rules when the historical circumstances resulted in new contexts, where their relative positions were altered. Commons have survived because some agents have found utility in them and could defend it, changing the rules if it was necessary."en_US
dc.identifier.citationconfdatesMarch 23-25en_US
dc.identifier.citationconferenceBuilding the European Commons: From Open Fields to Open Source, European Regional Meeting of the International Association for the Study of Common Property (IASCP)en_US
dc.identifier.citationconflocBrescia, Italyen_US
dc.identifier.citationmonthMarchen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10535/2223
dc.subjectIASCen_US
dc.subjectland tenure and use--historyen_US
dc.subjectland tenure and use--case studiesen_US
dc.subjectcommunity--historyen_US
dc.subjectsocial networks--historyen_US
dc.subject.sectorSocial Organizationen_US
dc.subject.sectorLand Tenure & Useen_US
dc.subject.sectorHistoryen_US
dc.submitter.emailyinjin@indiana.eduen_US
dc.titleTransfiguration of Community: Surviving of Commons in Navarra (Spain), 18th-20th Centuriesen_US
dc.typeConference Paperen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
LanaBerasain.pdf
Size:
79.06 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Collections