Framework for the Study of Indigenous Knowledge: Linking Social and Ecological Systems

dc.contributor.authorBerkes, Fikreten_US
dc.contributor.authorFolke, Carlen_US
dc.date.accessioned2009-07-31T14:31:25Z
dc.date.available2009-07-31T14:31:25Z
dc.date.issued1995en_US
dc.date.submitted2007-08-21en_US
dc.date.submitted2007-08-21en_US
dc.description.abstract"A considerable amount of evidence has accumulated to indicate that ecologically sensible indigenous practices have indeed existed in diverse ecosystems. Based on these findings, there is potential for improvement of resource management in environments such as northern coastal ecosystems, arid and semi-arid land ecosystems, mountain ecosystems, tropical forest ecosystems, subarctic ecosystems and island ecosystems. As compared to the rather narrow set of prescriptions of Western scientific resource management systems, some of which may inadvertently act to reduce ecosystem resilience, indigenous management is often associated with a diversity of property rights regimes and common-property institutions and locally-adapted practices, and it may operate under systems of knowledge substantially different from Western knowledge systems. "The framework we propose distinguishes seven sets of variables which can be used to describe social and ecological system characteristics and linkages in any indigenous resource use case study: (1) ecosystem, (2) resource users and technology, (3) local knowledge, (4) property rights, (5) institutions, (6) pattern of interactions, and (7) outcomes. Our framework borrows from that of Oakerson for the analysis of common-property management, and that of Ostrom for institutional analysis. "The key concept in our framework is resilience, to emphasize the importance of conditions in which disturbances (perturbations) can flip a system from one equilibrium state to another. We use Holling's definition of resilience, the magnitude of disturbance that can be absorbed before a system changes its structure by changing the variables and processes that control behavior. We hypothesize that: (1) maintaining resilience is important for both resources and social institutions, and therefore the well-being of social and ecological systems is closely linked; (2) successful traditional knowledge systems will allow perturbations to enter an ecosystem on a scale which does not threaten its structure and functional performance, and the services it provides; and (3) there will be evidence of co-evolution in such traditional systems, making the local community and their institutions "in tune" over time with the natural processes of the particular ecosystem."en_US
dc.identifier.citationconfdatesMay 24-28, 1995en_US
dc.identifier.citationconferenceReinventing the Commons, the Fifth Biennial Conference of the International Association for the Study of Common Propertyen_US
dc.identifier.citationconflocBodoe, Norwayen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10535/668
dc.subjectIASCen_US
dc.subjectcommon pool resourcesen_US
dc.subjectindigenous knowledgeen_US
dc.subjectinstitutional analysis--IAD frameworken_US
dc.subjectinstitutional analysis--Oakerson frameworken_US
dc.subjectecosystemsen_US
dc.subjectresilienceen_US
dc.subject.sectorGeneral & Multiple Resourcesen_US
dc.subject.sectorInformation & Knowledgeen_US
dc.submitter.emailaurasova@indiana.eduen_US
dc.titleFramework for the Study of Indigenous Knowledge: Linking Social and Ecological Systemsen_US
dc.typeConference Paperen_US
dc.type.publishedpublisheden_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
A_Framework_for_the_Study_of_Indigenous_Knowledge_Linking_Social_and_Ecological_Systemsl.pdf
Size:
1.79 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Collections