Spatial Dynamics of Sea Turtle Abundance and Shrimping Intensity in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico

dc.contributor.authorMcDaniel, Carrie J.en_US
dc.contributor.authorCrowder, Larry B.en_US
dc.contributor.authorPriddy, Jeffery A.en_US
dc.coverage.countryUnited States, Mexicoen_US
dc.coverage.regionNorth Americaen_US
dc.coverage.regionCentral America & Caribbeanen_US
dc.date.accessioned2009-07-31T14:51:01Z
dc.date.available2009-07-31T14:51:01Z
dc.date.issued2000en_US
dc.date.submitted2009-02-02en_US
dc.date.submitted2009-02-02en_US
dc.description.abstract"In order to examine the scientific feasibility of area closures for sea turtle protection, we determined the spatial dynamics of sea turtles for the U.S. Gulf of Mexico by analyzing National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) aerial survey data in September, October, and November of 1992, 1993, and 1994. Turtle sightings were grouped into depth zones and NMFS fishery statistical zones, and strip transect methods were used to estimate the relative abundance of sea turtles in each subzone. Average shrimping intensity was calculated for each subzone for all months of 1992, 1993, and 1994, as well as for the months and locations of the aerial survey. The spatial overlap of sea turtle abundance and shrimping intensity suggested regions where interactions are likely to occur. Sea turtles were observed at much higher rates along the coast of Florida than in the Western Gulf; the highest density of sea turtles was observed in the Florida Keys region (0.525 turtles/km2). Shrimping intensity was highest in the Western Gulf along the coast of Texas and Louisiana, for both annual and fall estimates. Among alternative management scenarios, area closures in conjunction with continued Turtle Excluder Device (TED) requirements would probably best prevent sea turtles from future extinction. By implementing shrimping closures off of South Padre Island, Texas, a potential second nesting population of Kemp's ridleys (Lepidochelys kempi) could be protected. Closing waters where shrimping intensity is low and sea turtle abundance is high (e.g., South Florida waters) would protect sea turtles without economically impacting a large number of shrimpers."en_US
dc.identifier.citationjournalEcology and Societyen_US
dc.identifier.citationmonthJulyen_US
dc.identifier.citationnumber1en_US
dc.identifier.citationvolume4en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10535/2533
dc.subjectenvironmental protectionen_US
dc.subjectwildlifeen_US
dc.subjectGISen_US
dc.subjectGulf of Mexicoen_US
dc.subjectsea turtlesen_US
dc.subjectshrimpen_US
dc.subjectfisheriesen_US
dc.subject.sectorWater Resource & Irrigationen_US
dc.subject.sectorWildlifeen_US
dc.titleSpatial Dynamics of Sea Turtle Abundance and Shrimping Intensity in the U.S. Gulf of Mexicoen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.type.publishedpublisheden_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Conservation_Ecology__Spatial_Dynamics_of_Sea_Turtle_Abundance_and_Shrimping.pdf
Size:
199.87 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Collections