Rationing Wilderness Use: Some Administrative and Equity Implications

dc.contributor.authorBaden, Johnen_US
dc.contributor.authorStankey, George H.en_US
dc.coverage.countryUnited Statesen_US
dc.coverage.regionNorth Americaen_US
dc.date.accessioned2009-07-31T15:18:55Z
dc.date.available2009-07-31T15:18:55Z
dc.date.issued1975en_US
dc.date.submitted2009-06-23en_US
dc.date.submitted2009-06-23en_US
dc.description.abstract"The issue of rationing Wilderness use is upon us. Nationally, Wilderness use has been growing at approximately 10 percent a year since about 1946. Although the current economic situation casts uncertainty as to future trends, it does not seem unreasonable to expect further growth, and as a consequence more problems. In the following discussion, we would like to explore one of the important aspects of rationing--the equity implications. Well-intentioned programs to control use that fail to fully weigh the equity costs imposed by such programs will certainly encounter stiff public resistances. One particularly serious consequence of such resistance might be the unwillingness of citizen groups to accept any rationing program, even when such a program is needed to prevent deterioration of the Wilderness resource."en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10535/4565
dc.subjectnatural resources--policyen_US
dc.subjectenvironmenten_US
dc.subjectforestry--policyen_US
dc.subjectecologyen_US
dc.subject.sectorForestryen_US
dc.titleRationing Wilderness Use: Some Administrative and Equity Implicationsen_US
dc.typeWorking Paperen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Rationing_wilderness_use_some_administrative_and_equity_implications.pdf
Size:
195.76 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Collections