Spatial Complexity, Resilience, and Policy Diversity: Fishing on Lake-Rich Landscapes

dc.contributor.authorCarpenter, Stephenen_US
dc.contributor.authorBrock, William A.en_US
dc.coverage.countryUnited Statesen_US
dc.coverage.regionNorth Americaen_US
dc.date.accessioned2009-07-31T14:51:31Z
dc.date.available2009-07-31T14:51:31Z
dc.date.issued2004en_US
dc.date.submitted2008-09-05en_US
dc.date.submitted2008-09-05en_US
dc.description.abstract"The dynamics of and policies governing spatially coupled social-ecological mosaics are considered for the case of fisheries in a lake district. A microeconomic model of households addresses agent decisions at three hierarchic levels: (1) selection of the lake district from among a larger set of alternative places to live or visit, (2) selection of a base location within the lake district, and (3) selection of a portfolio of ecosystem services to use. Ecosystem services are represented by dynamics of fish production subject to multiple stable domains and trophic cascades. Policy calculations show that optimal policies will be highly heterogeneous in space and fluid in time. The diversity of possible outcomes is illustrated by simulations for a hypothetical lake district based loosely on the Northern Highlands of the State of Wisconsin. Lake districts are frequently managed as if lakes were independent, similar, endogenously regulating systems. Our findings contradict that view. One-size-fits-all (OSFA) policies erode ecological and social resilience. If regulations are too stringent, social resilience declines because of the potential rewards of overharvesting. If regulations are too lax, ecological resilience is diminished by overharvesting in some lakes. In either case, local collapses of fish populations evoke spatial shifts of angling effort that can lead to serial collapses in neighboring fisheries and degraded fisheries in most or all of the lakes. Under OSFA management, the natural resources of the entire landscape become more vulnerable to transformation because of changes in, e.g., human population, the demand for resources, or fish harvesting technology. Multiplicity of management regimes can increase the ecological resilience, social resilience, and inclusive value of a spatially heterogeneous social-ecological system. Because of the complex interactions of mobile people and multistable ecosystems, management regimes must also be flexible over time. A rights-based scheme may facilitate policy regimes with appropriate spatial patterns and intertemporal fluidity. In lake fisheries, habitat protection adds an important dimension to policy design. Habitat is a slowly changing variable that creates ecological resilience and thereby provides managers with a broader range of options."en_US
dc.identifier.citationjournalEcology and Societyen_US
dc.identifier.citationmonthJuneen_US
dc.identifier.citationnumber1en_US
dc.identifier.citationvolume9en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10535/2581
dc.subjectfisheriesen_US
dc.subjectlakesen_US
dc.subjectecologyen_US
dc.subjecteconomic policyen_US
dc.subjecteconomics--modelsen_US
dc.subjectresilienceen_US
dc.subjectagent-based computational economicsen_US
dc.subject.sectorGeneral & Multiple Resourcesen_US
dc.subject.sectorFisheriesen_US
dc.titleSpatial Complexity, Resilience, and Policy Diversity: Fishing on Lake-Rich Landscapesen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.type.publishedpublisheden_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Carpenter-et-al.pdf
Size:
3.83 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Collections