Property Rights, Collective Action and Poverty: The Role of Institutions for Poverty Reduction

dc.contributor.authorDi Gregorio, Monicaen_US
dc.contributor.authorHagedorn, Konraden_US
dc.contributor.authorKirk, Michaelen_US
dc.contributor.authorKorf, Benedikten_US
dc.contributor.authorMcCarthy, Nancyen_US
dc.contributor.authorMeinzen-Dick, Ruthen_US
dc.contributor.authorSwallow, Brent M.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2009-07-31T14:35:33Z
dc.date.available2009-07-31T14:35:33Z
dc.date.issued2004en_US
dc.date.submitted2008-07-10en_US
dc.date.submitted2008-07-10en_US
dc.description.abstractFrom Introduction: "...This paper presents a conceptual framework for examining how property rights and collective action can contribute to poverty reduction, including both external interventions and action by poor people themselves. We begin with definitions of the key concepts--poverty, property rights, and collective action. We then turn to an examination of how property rights and collective action are related to poverty outcomes, building upon the Institutional Analysis and Development (IAD) framework. This interdisciplinary framework allows analysis of a wide range of interactions, and is useful for eliciting relevant questions for examination in any particular case. At the heart of this framework is the action arena, which is shaped by initial conditions and, in turn, determines a range of outcomes. Applying this framework to poverty reduction, we present an analysis of the initial conditions of poverty, including the asset base, risks and vulnerability, legal structure and power relations. We next look at the dynamics of actors both poor and non-poor and how they use the tangible and intangible resources they have to shape their livelihoods and the institutions in which they live. We conclude with a discussion of how this framework can improve our understanding of the outcomes in terms of changes in poverty status. "Discussing such complex and dynamic processes in one paper requires generalization, yet we know that both the material and institutional conditions of the poor vary from place to place, and change over time. Recognizing the importance of local circumstances, we have phrased many of the key points as propositions, to be considered for different situations, but not necessarily applying to all. We hope that this will provide a basis for further thinking and discussion; and in particular, for further empirical analysis, which can advance our understanding of the role collective action and property rights can play in poverty reduction."en_US
dc.identifier.citationconfdatesAugust 9-13en_US
dc.identifier.citationconferenceThe Commons in an Age of Global Transition: Challenges, Risks and Opportunities, the Tenth Biennial Conference of the International Association for the Study of Common Propertyen_US
dc.identifier.citationconflocOaxaca, Mexicoen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10535/1270
dc.subjectIASCen_US
dc.subjectinstitutionsen_US
dc.subjectproperty rightsen_US
dc.subjectcollective actionen_US
dc.subjectpoverty alleviation--modelsen_US
dc.subjectinstitutional analysis--IAD frameworken_US
dc.subject.sectorTheoryen_US
dc.subject.sectorLand Tenure & Useen_US
dc.submitter.emailyinjin@indiana.eduen_US
dc.titleProperty Rights, Collective Action and Poverty: The Role of Institutions for Poverty Reductionen_US
dc.typeConference Paperen_US
dc.type.publishedunpublisheden_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
DiGregorio_Property_040702_Paper443.pdf
Size:
477.53 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Collections