Tribes, State, and Technology Adoption in Arid Land Management, Syria

dc.contributor.authorRae, Jonathanen_US
dc.contributor.authorArab, G.en_US
dc.contributor.authorNordblom, T.en_US
dc.contributor.authorJani, K.en_US
dc.contributor.authorGintzburger, G.en_US
dc.coverage.countrySyriaen_US
dc.coverage.regionMiddle East & South Asiaen_US
dc.date.accessioned2009-07-31T15:08:13Z
dc.date.available2009-07-31T15:08:13Z
dc.date.issued2001en_US
dc.date.submitted2007-07-30en_US
dc.date.submitted2007-07-30en_US
dc.description.abstract"Arid shrub-lands in Syria and elsewhere in West Asia and North Africa are widely thought degraded. Characteristic of these areas is a preponderance of unpalatable shrubs or a lack of overall ground cover with a rise in the associated risks of soil erosion. Migrating pastoralists have been the scapegoats for this condition of the range. State steppe interventions of the last forty years have reflected this with programs to supplant customary systems with structures and institutions promoting western grazing systems and technologies. Principal amongst the latter has been shrub technology, particularly Atriplex species, for use in land rehabilitation and s a fodder reserve. This paper deconstructs state steppe policy in Syria by examining the overlap and interface of government and customary legal systems as a factor in the history of shrub technology transfer in the Syrian steppe. It is argued that the link made between signs of degradation and perceived moribund customary systems is not at all causal. Indeed, customary systems are found to be adaptive and resilient, and a strong influence on steppe management and the fate of technology transfer initiatives. Furthermore, developments in rangeland ecology raise questions about claims for grazing-induced degradation and call for a reinterpretation of recent shifts in vegetation on the Syrian steppe. Given the ineffectiveness of past state interventions, and in view of renewed understanding of customary systems and rangeland ecology, decentralization and some devolution of formal management responsibility is likely to be a viable and an attractive option for policymakers."en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10535/3730
dc.languageEnglishen_US
dc.publisher.workingpaperseriesInternational Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI), Washington, DCen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesCAPRi Working Paper, no. 15en_US
dc.subjectarid regionsen_US
dc.subjectcustomary lawen_US
dc.subjectrangelandsen_US
dc.subjectgrazingen_US
dc.subjectpastoralismen_US
dc.subjectland degradationen_US
dc.subject.sectorLand Tenure & Useen_US
dc.submitter.emailm.acharya@cgiar.orgen_US
dc.titleTribes, State, and Technology Adoption in Arid Land Management, Syriaen_US
dc.typeWorking Paperen_US
dc.type.methodologyCase Studyen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
CAPRiWP_15.pdf
Size:
174.71 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Collections