Why I Came to Agree with Dropping 'Property' from the Association's Name

dc.contributor.authorLynch, Owen J.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2009-07-31T14:53:44Z
dc.date.available2009-07-31T14:53:44Z
dc.date.issued2006en_US
dc.date.submitted2008-04-16en_US
dc.date.submitted2008-04-16en_US
dc.description.abstract"Until recently I was resistant to dropping the word property from the Associations name. My reluctance was two-fold. First, the Association has long struggled with a perception by many local community activists and field practitioners that it is overly academic and too often more interested in theory than the sustainability of common property systems designed and managed by local people. I believe it is important for the Association to maintain a creative balance and foster more productive synergy between theoretical and applied endeavors."en_US
dc.identifier.citationjournalThe Commons Digesten_US
dc.identifier.citationmonthDecemberen_US
dc.identifier.citationvolume2en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10535/2783
dc.subjectIASCen_US
dc.subjectcommonsen_US
dc.subject.sectorSocial Organizationen_US
dc.submitter.emailrshivakoti@yahoo.comen_US
dc.titleWhy I Came to Agree with Dropping 'Property' from the Association's Nameen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.type.publishedpublisheden_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Response_to.pdf
Size:
26.56 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Collections