Management of Communal Grazing Land: A Case Study on Institutions for Collective Action in Endabeg Village, Tanzania

dc.contributor.authorNilsson, Tobiasen_US
dc.coverage.countryTanzaniaen_US
dc.coverage.regionAfricaen_US
dc.date.accessioned2009-07-31T15:04:19Z
dc.date.available2009-07-31T15:04:19Z
dc.date.issued2001en_US
dc.date.submitted2002-12-03en_US
dc.date.submitted2002-12-03en_US
dc.description.abstract"From a selection of literature on natural resource management, Elinor Ostrom's (1990) set of design principles, characterising long-enduring institutions governing common-pool resources, is chosen as a template for making a rapid but structured assessment of the institutional performance in one field setting ? management of grazing land in Endabeg Village, Tanzania. Field data, collected through informal observations and semi-structured interviews with a non-random sample of key informants, is presented, as well as information gathered from secondary sources. Each of Ostrom?s eight design principles is analysed and valuated, with regard to representation in the field setting. Summarising the analysis of grazing land management in Endabeg Village and its surroundings, the lack of a coherent system of nested enterprises turns out as an Achilles' Heel for institutional development. The overall institutional performance is on separate terms assessed a failure, by use of a small set of non-complicated indicators. A concluding judgement of the local institution in Endabeg would read: Bad performance but good prospects. Important prerequisites are fulfilled, and external factors do not pose any insurmountable hinders to institutional improvement. Eventually, the present case of Endabeg is placed in context together with a selection of case studies presented in Ostrom?s book. The valuation of design principles, put together with the brief assessment of overall institutional performance, proves to coincide well with Ostrom's existing correlation pattern between representation of design principles and institutional performance. Prevalence of traditional institutions parallel to the modern administration in the chosen field setting raises a discussion about loopholes contained in the chosen template, and the way such loopholes make the field data collector vulnerable to omission of large sets of significant information. Ostrom's methodological framework is suggested to contain opportunities for further studies within the same field."en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10535/3570
dc.languageEnglishen_US
dc.publisher.workingpaperseriesRoyal Institute of Technology, Sweden, Department of Infrastructure and Planningen_US
dc.subjectagricultureen_US
dc.subjectcommon pool resourcesen_US
dc.subjectcollective action--case studiesen_US
dc.subjectgrazingen_US
dc.subjectdesign principlesen_US
dc.subjectpastoralismen_US
dc.subjectopen accessen_US
dc.subjectOstrom, Elinoren_US
dc.subjectvillage organizationen_US
dc.subject.sectorGrazingen_US
dc.subject.sectorSocial Organizationen_US
dc.submitter.emailtobiastobias@yahoo.comen_US
dc.titleManagement of Communal Grazing Land: A Case Study on Institutions for Collective Action in Endabeg Village, Tanzaniaen_US
dc.typeThesis or Dissertationen_US
dc.type.methodologyCase Studyen_US
dc.type.publishedpublisheden_US
dc.type.thesistypeMaster's thesisen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
WebThesis.pdf
Size:
2.94 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format