Institutional Fit and River Basin Governance: A New Approach Using Multiple Composite Measures

dc.contributor.authorLebel, Louis
dc.contributor.authorNikitina, Elena
dc.contributor.authorPahl-Wostl, Claudia
dc.contributor.authorKnieper, Christian
dc.date.accessioned2013-03-21T15:24:46Z
dc.date.available2013-03-21T15:24:46Z
dc.date.issued2013en_US
dc.description.abstract"The notion that effective environmental governance depends in part on achieving a reasonable fit between institutional arrangements and the features of ecosystems and their interconnections with users has been central to much thinking about social-ecological systems for more than a decade. Based on expert consultations this study proposes a set of six dimensions of fit for water governance regimes and then empirically explores variation in measures of these in 28 case studies of national parts of river basins in Europe, Asia, Latin America, and Africa drawing on a database compiled by the Twin2Go project. The six measures capture different but potentially important dimensions of fit: allocation, integration, conservation, basinization, participation, and adaptation. Based on combinations of responses to a standard questionnaire filled in by groups of experts in each basin we derived quantitative measures for each indicator. Substantial variation in these measures of fit was apparent among basins in developing and developed countries. Geographical location is not a barrier to high institutional fit; but within basins different measures of fit often diverge. This suggests it is difficult, but not impossible, to simultaneously achieve a high fit against multiple challenging conditions. Comparing multidimensional fit profiles give a sense of how well water governance regimes are equipped for dealing with a range of natural resource and use-related conditions and suggests areas for priority intervention. The findings of this study thus confirm and help explain previous work that has concluded that context is important for understanding the variable consequences of institutional reform on water governance practices as well as on social and environmental outcomes."en_US
dc.identifier.citationjournalEcology and Societyen_US
dc.identifier.citationnumber1en_US
dc.identifier.citationvolume18en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10535/8750
dc.languageEnglishen_US
dc.subjectcomparative analysisen_US
dc.subjectinstitutional analysisen_US
dc.subjectriver basinsen_US
dc.subjectwater managementen_US
dc.subject.sectorSocial Organizationen_US
dc.subject.sectorWater Resource & Irrigationen_US
dc.titleInstitutional Fit and River Basin Governance: A New Approach Using Multiple Composite Measuresen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.type.methodologyCase Studyen_US
dc.type.publishedpublisheden_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
ES-2012-5097(1).pdf
Size:
1.21 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Collections