Rethinking the Decentralization and Devolution of Biodiversity Conservation

dc.contributor.authorEnters, Thomas
dc.contributor.authorAnderson, Jon
dc.date.accessioned2012-09-26T20:40:16Z
dc.date.available2012-09-26T20:40:16Z
dc.date.issued1999en_US
dc.description.abstract"In the traditional approach to biodiversity conservation, local people and their economic activities were viewed as threats to the undisturbed functioning of natural ecosystems and were to be excluded from protected areas. However, it became evident that the social costs of exclusionary conservation projects were sometimes high, and that their success rate, even in biological terms, was disappointing. As a result, the classical approach has been replaced by integrated conservation and development projects (ICDPs) whose goal is to 'enhance biodiversity conservation through approaches that attempt to address the needs, constraints and opportunities of local people' by involving local people as active partners."en_US
dc.identifier.citationjournalUnasylvaen_US
dc.identifier.citationnumber199en_US
dc.identifier.citationpages6-11en_US
dc.identifier.citationvolume50en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10535/8401
dc.languageEnglishen_US
dc.publisher.workingpaperseriesFood and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, Italyen_US
dc.subjectbiodiversityen_US
dc.subjectconservationen_US
dc.subjectforest managementen_US
dc.subjectparticipatory managementen_US
dc.subjectcommunity participationen_US
dc.subjectlocal knowledgeen_US
dc.subject.sectorForestryen_US
dc.subject.sectorGeneral & Multiple Resourcesen_US
dc.titleRethinking the Decentralization and Devolution of Biodiversity Conservationen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.type.methodologyCase Studyen_US
dc.type.publishedpublisheden_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Rethinking the decentralization and devolution of biodiversity conservation.pdf
Size:
50.08 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Collections