Smallholder Irrigation Schemes: A Common Property Resource with Management Challenges

dc.contributor.authorSamakanda, I.en_US
dc.contributor.authorSenzanje, A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorMjmba, M.en_US
dc.coverage.countryZimbabween_US
dc.coverage.regionAfricaen_US
dc.date.accessioned2009-07-31T14:44:30Z
dc.date.available2009-07-31T14:44:30Z
dc.date.issued2002en_US
dc.date.submitted2002-11-08en_US
dc.date.submitted2002-11-08en_US
dc.description.abstract"Smallholder irrigation schemes are common property resources (CPR) faced with various challenges in the use of productive water. This is more so in the light of integrated water resources management, water reform, leading to water being regarded as an economic good and the default handover of the schemes to farmers by government. The sustainability of smallholder irrigation schemes is depends on performance of the irrigation scheme, which in turn is hinged on adherence to CPR concepts. This paper reviews the challenges faced by farmers in smallholder irrigation schemes, with respect to CPR concepts in trying to make use of productive water to sustain their livelihoods. The study considers three irrigation schemes, namely Chakohwa, Nenhowe and Gudyanga irrigation schemes, all in the lower Odzi sub-catchment. The schemes have different technologies that require different levels of organisational intensity, and offer varying challenges to operation and maintenance. Water in these irrigation schemes is regarded as the most limiting factor to production; hence its management is regarded as crucial. The role played by various stakeholders (ZINWA, Agritex and farmers) in irrigation management is reviewed. The way farmers respond to common purpose issues like servicing their electricity bills, maintaining their canals is also considered against a background of their agronomic performance. Common property resources have to be shared equally to avoid chasms within the resource users/ managers. Irrigators at all times want to receive their share of the water so that they feel secure about the investment made (purchase of seeds, fertiliser, labour and energy). Farmers who feel prejudiced in resource allocation feel less motivated; invest less, perform poorly and do not contribute to operation and maintenance costs, which result in the scheme deteriorating. An understanding of how farmers and institutions try to balance the facets of smallholder irrigation management will help in coming up with recommendations for CPR principles that need to be engaged for improved sustainability of irrigation schemes."en_US
dc.identifier.citationconfdatesJune 17-21, 2002en_US
dc.identifier.citationconferenceThe Commons in an Age of Globalisation, the Ninth Biennial Conference of the International Association for the Study of Common Propertyen_US
dc.identifier.citationconflocVictoria Falls, Zimbabween_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10535/2328
dc.languageEnglishen_US
dc.subjectIASCen_US
dc.subjectcommon pool resourcesen_US
dc.subjectirrigation--case studyen_US
dc.subjectwater resourcesen_US
dc.subjectsmallholdersen_US
dc.subjectagricultureen_US
dc.subject.sectorAgricultureen_US
dc.subject.sectorWater Resource & Irrigationen_US
dc.submitter.emailjerwolfe@indiana.eduen_US
dc.titleSmallholder Irrigation Schemes: A Common Property Resource with Management Challengesen_US
dc.typeConference Paperen_US
dc.type.publishedunpublisheden_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
samakandei040402.pdf
Size:
203.31 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Collections