Changing Boarders of the Management Unit: An Effect of Decentralization and Formalization in Communal Forest Management, Yasothon, Thailand

dc.contributor.authorUbukata, Fumikazuen_US
dc.coverage.countryThailanden_US
dc.coverage.regionEast Asiaen_US
dc.date.accessioned2009-07-31T14:36:01Z
dc.date.available2009-07-31T14:36:01Z
dc.date.issued2008en_US
dc.date.submitted2008-11-12en_US
dc.date.submitted2008-11-12en_US
dc.description.abstract"Community-based natural resource management (CBNRM) is often regarded as one of the vital options to achieve environmental protection and social justice in rural area. Here local communities are assumed to be more effective than state in managing their resources, and the smallness of communities and resources themselves partly presuppose this assumption. In many cases, decentralization of natural resource management thus aims to 'scale-down' formal operational management unit in order to achieve better resource governance. On the other hand, recent administrative reforms in developing countries sometimes require larger area as a management unit, in order to formalize local management institutions. Through the coordination of these contradicting forces regarding management units, it appears that communities and authorities try to establish 'nested enterprises' of resource management. How then can communities and authorities institutionalize these 'nested enterprises' What problems will arise in the process? And how will the process affect potentiality of management performance? Taking two contrasting processes of the 'scaling-up' attempts in communal forest management in Thailand as examples, this study examined similarities and differences in the process of coordination of management units. "The study found that, firstly, both cases had experienced two-stage process of development in resource management institutions, although the influential actors in the process were different. Second, each process had faced its unique set of problems in resource management, indicating their path dependency. Third, local enclosure or 'territorialization' process, which is prone to broke off existing network of resource use, was more representative than internal institutional evolution process within the community. This process is considered to be one of the key concepts in understanding current coordination process of community resource management in Thailand, as well as 'networking' process in the case of community forest movements in the Northern area."en_US
dc.identifier.citationconfdatesJuly 14-18, 2008en_US
dc.identifier.citationconferenceGoverning Shared Resources: Connecting Local Experience to Global Challenges, the Twelfth Biennial Conference of the International Association for the Study of Commonsen_US
dc.identifier.citationconflocCheltenham, Englanden_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10535/1333
dc.subjectCBRMen_US
dc.subjectcommunity forestryen_US
dc.subjectdecentralizationen_US
dc.subjectIASCen_US
dc.subject.sectorForestryen_US
dc.titleChanging Boarders of the Management Unit: An Effect of Decentralization and Formalization in Communal Forest Management, Yasothon, Thailanden_US
dc.typeConference Paperen_US
dc.type.publishedunpublisheden_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Ubukata_128401.pdf
Size:
153.9 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Collections