Racing for the Water: Laboratory Evidence on Managing a Groundwater Commons

dc.contributor.authorGardner, Roy
dc.contributor.authorMoore, Michael R.
dc.contributor.authorWalker, James M.
dc.date.accessioned2009-11-23T21:22:23Z
dc.date.available2009-11-23T21:22:23Z
dc.date.issued1994en_US
dc.description.abstract"This paper examines strategic behavior in the context of a dynamic common-pool resource game with a unique symmetric subgame equilibrium. Solving the model for its optimal solution and its subgame perfect equilibrium provides benchmarks for behavior observed in laboratory experiments. Baseline experiments, which portray a 'rule of capture' for establishing ownership with group size equal to 10, achieve an average efficiency of 30%. Experiments that restrict entry, with group size equal to 5, increase average efficiency to 44%. Experiments applying a stock quota show more marked improvement in efficiency, averaging 54%. The stock quota experiments come closest to producing data consistent with subgame perfection."en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10535/5209
dc.languageEnglishen_US
dc.publisher.workingpaperseriesWorkshop in Political Theory and Policy Analysis, Indiana University Bloomington, INen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesWorking Paper W94-7en_US
dc.subjectgroundwater--modelsen_US
dc.subjectwater resourcesen_US
dc.subjectgame theoryen_US
dc.subjectWorkshopen_US
dc.subject.sectorWater Resource & Irrigationen_US
dc.titleRacing for the Water: Laboratory Evidence on Managing a Groundwater Commonsen_US
dc.typeWorking Paperen_US
dc.type.methodologyCase Studyen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Racing for the water labratory evidence on managing groundwater commons.pdf
Size:
306.8 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Collections