Lack of Agreement on Fragmentation Metrics Blurs Correspondence between Fragmentation Experiments and Predicted Effects

dc.contributor.authorBogaert, Janen_US
dc.date.accessioned2009-07-31T15:01:58Z
dc.date.available2009-07-31T15:01:58Z
dc.date.issued2003en_US
dc.date.submitted2008-09-02en_US
dc.date.submitted2008-09-02en_US
dc.description.abstract"The direct correspondence between landscape fragmentation and its effects is still the subject of debate. Many widely accepted hypotheses are not supported by experiments. The issue of fragmentation measurement is addressed here. To predict the effects of fragmentation, it is essential to quantify the pattern of fragmentation. Despite the increased use of spatial analysis and available measures, experts have not yet reached an agreement on how to measure patterns of fragmented landscapes and, thus, unambiguous translation of experimental findings into conservation or management guidelines is hampered."en_US
dc.identifier.citationjournalEcology and Societyen_US
dc.identifier.citationmonthJulyen_US
dc.identifier.citationnumber1en_US
dc.identifier.citationvolume7en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10535/3508
dc.subjectfragmentationen_US
dc.subject.sectorTheoryen_US
dc.titleLack of Agreement on Fragmentation Metrics Blurs Correspondence between Fragmentation Experiments and Predicted Effectsen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.type.publishedpublisheden_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
lack_of_agreement.pdf
Size:
86.52 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Collections