Silences and Double Binds: Why the Theories of John Dewey and Paulo Freire Cannot Contribute to Revitalizing the Commons

dc.contributor.authorBowers, Chet A.en_US
dc.coverage.countryUnited Statesen_US
dc.coverage.regionNorth Americaen_US
dc.date.accessioned2009-07-31T14:54:20Z
dc.date.available2009-07-31T14:54:20Z
dc.date.issued2006en_US
dc.date.submitted2008-04-02en_US
dc.date.submitted2008-04-02en_US
dc.description.abstract"I will argue that in spite of their concern with social justice, Dewey and Freire shared a number of assumptions with today's proponents of globalizing the industrial/consumer-based culture which drives planetary ecological breakdown. I begin by summarizing four major trends that put our collective future at risk. This summary is intended to serve as a reference point for assessing whether the pro-environmental interpretations of the core ideas of Dewey and Freire can turn them into sources of resistance to these destructive trends."en_US
dc.identifier.citationjournalCapitalism Nature Socialismen_US
dc.identifier.citationmonthSeptemberen_US
dc.identifier.citationnumber3en_US
dc.identifier.citationvolume17en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10535/2837
dc.subjectcommon pool resourcesen_US
dc.subjectglobalizationen_US
dc.subjectenvironmenten_US
dc.subject.sectorSocial Organizationen_US
dc.subject.sectorGeneral & Multiple Resourcesen_US
dc.titleSilences and Double Binds: Why the Theories of John Dewey and Paulo Freire Cannot Contribute to Revitalizing the Commonsen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.type.publishedpublisheden_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
755289708.pdf
Size:
115.13 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Collections