Responsible Governing of Coastal Common Resources in the North

dc.contributor.authorSandberg, Audunen_US
dc.contributor.authorSkorstad, Beriten_US
dc.contributor.authorSagdahl, Bjorn K.en_US
dc.coverage.regionEuropeen_US
dc.date.accessioned2009-07-31T14:39:42Z
dc.date.available2009-07-31T14:39:42Z
dc.date.issued2000en_US
dc.date.submitted2007-07-16en_US
dc.date.submitted2007-07-16en_US
dc.description.abstract"This paper synthesizes the major findings from two international comparative research programs under the auspices of the European Union. One of these projects, the COASTMAN project, has analyzed the institutional foundations of Northern Coastal Commons and the experiences with newly crafted institutions for Integrated Coastal Zone Management. The other project, the ELSA-PECHE project, has analyzed the attitudes to ecosystem responsibility and other ethical questions in Norway, Iceland and Denmark. "By bringing together an institutional analysis approach and a normative analysis of prevailing ethical attitudes, the paper will attempt to penetrate deeper into the constitutional basis for both the coastal management regimes and the fisheries management regimes of Northern Waters. The forces of change are quite similar in the two regimes, and akin to the overall modernization processes in the rest of society. In fisheries this has resulted in individualized quota systems that tend to break down the fishing communities and the moral collectivity of fishermen. But coastal fisheries are also influenced by developments in other kinds of coastal resource utilization, especially a slow transfer from species/population management models to more territorially based modern sea-tenure system. This often lands them into a squeeze between a drive for further rationalization and increased restrictions on their mobility and freedom to use sea areas. "On the other hand, territorially based modernization forces are found in the logic of aquaculture growth and growth in sea ranching and the growing of shellfish and mussels on the seabed. While the traditional institutions of the Coastal Commons withered away under the heavy influence of sectoral rationality, new institutions for a more integrated kind of 'Ecosystem Commons' have to be crafted as the growth of area consuming marine resource transformation increase in total occupancy and in economic importance to coastal communities. In addition, a development of bio-ethics and principles of ecosystem responsibility takes place parallel to the technological shifts in marine resource utilization. These can be either lagging behind or advancing ahead of the development of new forms of production. The paper analyses these shifts in normative basis for the changing institutions and outline the need for a new normative basis for crafting new kinds of institutions for governing Coastal and Marine common resources in the North."en_US
dc.identifier.citationconfdatesMay 31-June 4en_US
dc.identifier.citationconferenceConstituting the Commons: Crafting Sustainable Commons in the New Millennium, the Eighth Biennial Conference of the International Association for the Study of Common Propertyen_US
dc.identifier.citationconflocBloomington, Indiana, USAen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10535/1799
dc.languageEnglishen_US
dc.subjectIASCen_US
dc.subjectcommon pool resourcesen_US
dc.subjectcoastal resourcesen_US
dc.subjectattitudesen_US
dc.subjectethicsen_US
dc.subjectinstitutional designen_US
dc.subjectfisheriesen_US
dc.subject.sectorFisheriesen_US
dc.subject.sectorWater Resource & Irrigationen_US
dc.submitter.emailhess@indiana.eduen_US
dc.titleResponsible Governing of Coastal Common Resources in the Northen_US
dc.typeConference Paperen_US
dc.type.publishedunpublisheden_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
sandberga041300.pdf
Size:
88.88 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Collections