Power and Conflict in Adaptive Management: Analyzing the Discourse of Riparian Management on Public Lands

dc.contributor.authorArnold, Jennifer S.
dc.contributor.authorKoro-Ljungberg, Mirka
dc.contributor.authorBartels, Wendy-Lin
dc.coverage.countryUnited Statesen_US
dc.coverage.regionNorth Americaen_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-08-23T20:01:55Z
dc.date.available2012-08-23T20:01:55Z
dc.date.issued2012en_US
dc.description.abstract"Adaptive collaborative management emphasizes stakeholder engagement as a crucial component of resilient social-ecological systems. Collaboration among diverse stakeholders is expected to enhance learning, build social legitimacy for decision making, and establish relationships that support learning and adaptation in the long term. However, simply bringing together diverse stakeholders does not guarantee productive engagement. Using critical discourse analysis, we examined how diverse stakeholders negotiated knowledge and power in a workshop designed to inform adaptive management of riparian livestock grazing on a National Forest in the southwestern USA. Publicly recognized as a successful component of a larger collaborative effort, we found that the workshop effectively brought together diverse participants, yet still restricted dialogue in important ways. Notably, workshop facilitators took on the additional roles of riparian experts and instructors. As they guided workshop participants toward a consensus view of riparian conditions and management recommendations, they used their status as riparian experts to emphasize commonalities with stakeholders supportive of riparian grazing and accentuate differences with stakeholders skeptical of riparian grazing, including some Forest Service staff with power to influence management decisions. Ultimately, the management plan published one year later did not fully adopt the consensus view from the workshop, but rather included and acknowledged a broader diversity of stakeholder perspectives. Our findings suggest that leaders and facilitators of adaptive collaborative management can more effectively manage for productive stakeholder engagement and, thus, socialecological resilience if they are more tentative in their convictions, more critical of the role of expert knowledge, and more attentive to the knowledge, interests, and power of diverse stakeholders."en_US
dc.identifier.citationjournalEcology and Societyen_US
dc.identifier.citationnumber1en_US
dc.identifier.citationvolume17en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10535/8321
dc.languageEnglishen_US
dc.subjectcollaborationen_US
dc.subjectconflicten_US
dc.subjectriparian rightsen_US
dc.subjectstakeholdersen_US
dc.subjectlivestocken_US
dc.subjectgrazingen_US
dc.subjectcommunity participationen_US
dc.subjectsocial behavioren_US
dc.subject.sectorLand Tenure & Useen_US
dc.subject.sectorWater Resource & Irrigationen_US
dc.titlePower and Conflict in Adaptive Management: Analyzing the Discourse of Riparian Management on Public Landsen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.type.methodologyCase Studyen_US
dc.type.publishedpublisheden_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Power and Conflict in Adaptive Management.pdf
Size:
139.72 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Collections