Occupying the Land: Traditional Patterns of Land and Resource Ownership among First Peoples of British Columbia

dc.contributor.authorTurner, Nancyen_US
dc.contributor.authorJones, James T.en_US
dc.coverage.countryCanadaen_US
dc.coverage.regionNorth Americaen_US
dc.date.accessioned2009-07-31T14:41:01Z
dc.date.available2009-07-31T14:41:01Z
dc.date.issued2000en_US
dc.date.submitted2007-07-16en_US
dc.date.submitted2007-07-16en_US
dc.description.abstract"A frequent misconception of early European settlers in what is now British Columbia was that the Aboriginal inhabitants were not really using most of the land, did not really 'occupy' very much of it, and held no real concepts of ownership for either the land or its resources. This perpsective was encouraged among the newcomers, who otherwise might have had to restrict their own desired occupation of the land and conform to existing codes of ownership. "In fact, First Peoples throughout the region had well developed concepts of territory, occupancy and proprietorship over lands and resources with firmly embedded protocols for resource use and distribution within and among families and communities. These concepts varied from one cultural group to another, and access to some areas and prime resources, like salmon streams and valuable root-digging and berry gathering areas, were more closely controlled than others. In all cases, however, traditional proprietorship was inextricably linked with responsibilities of the owners for stewardship and sharing of resources. "We provide examples of different cultural models of land and resource ownership, ranging from communal control of territory at the tribal level for Salishan peoples, to more specifically focused hereditary ownership and control of lands by clan chiefs, as practiced by the Nuu-Chah-Nulth, Kwakwaka'wakw, Haida, Nisga'a and other Northwest Coast peoples. The implications of these systems of ownership for resource sustainability are also discussed. The systems have been largely disrupted from the imposition of European law and property systems, but they still exist, and with new arrangements for land tenure deriving from treaty negotiations, they may be reinstated to some extent in the coming years. There is a good potential for improving contemporary resource management through incorporation of some of these traditional models of land tenure and use."en_US
dc.identifier.citationconfdatesMay 31-June 4en_US
dc.identifier.citationconferenceConstituting the Commons: Crafting Sustainable Commons in the New Millennium, the Eighth Biennial Conference of the International Association for the Study of Common Propertyen_US
dc.identifier.citationconflocBloomington, INen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10535/1952
dc.languageEnglishen_US
dc.subjectIASCen_US
dc.subjectcommon pool resourcesen_US
dc.subjectland tenure and useen_US
dc.subjectownership--historyen_US
dc.subjectproperty rightsen_US
dc.subjectindigenous institutionsen_US
dc.subjectNative Americansen_US
dc.subjectsocial organizationen_US
dc.subjectcultureen_US
dc.subject.sectorSocial Organizationen_US
dc.subject.sectorLand Tenure & Useen_US
dc.submitter.emailhess@indiana.eduen_US
dc.titleOccupying the Land: Traditional Patterns of Land and Resource Ownership among First Peoples of British Columbiaen_US
dc.typeConference Paperen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
turnern041200.pdf
Size:
79.96 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Collections