| dc.contributor.author |
De Keyzer, Maïka |
|
| dc.date.accessioned |
2018-03-02T18:17:05Z |
|
| dc.date.available |
2018-03-02T18:17:05Z |
|
| dc.date.issued |
2017 |
en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri |
https://hdl.handle.net/10535/10379 |
|
| dc.description.abstract |
"What makes common pool institutions (CPIs) successful? In commons studies this question is only
seldom asked. Most often success is implicitly assumed. Elinor Ostrom herself used a rather vague
definition. Institutions are successful when they enable individuals to achieve productive outcomes in
situations where temptations to free-ride and shirk are ever present .1 Others looked more at
endurance. If collective action was institutionalised and endured for a longer time span, CPIs are
deemed successful. Only when institutions for collective action falter or are abolished, the question of
success or the lack thereof, arises." |
en_US |
| dc.language |
English |
en_US |
| dc.title |
Successful Commons: What's in a Name |
en_US |
| dc.type |
Conference Paper |
en_US |
| dc.type.published |
unpublished |
en_US |
| dc.type.methodology |
Case Study |
en_US |
| dc.subject.sector |
General & Multiple Resources |
en_US |
| dc.identifier.citationconference |
Practicing the Commons: Self-Governance, Cooperation and Institutional Change |
en_US |
| dc.identifier.citationconfdates |
10-14 July |
en_US |
| dc.identifier.citationconfloc |
Utrecht, the Netherlands |
en_US |