hidden
Image Database Export Citations

Menu:

Role and Use of Common Property Resources (CPRs) in Bhutan Himalayas: Between Tradition and Globalisation

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Turkelboom, Francis en_US
dc.contributor.author Gurung, Tayan Raj en_US
dc.contributor.author Duba, Sangey en_US
dc.date.accessioned 2009-07-31T14:35:45Z
dc.date.available 2009-07-31T14:35:45Z
dc.date.issued 2001 en_US
dc.date.submitted 2007-07-09 en_US
dc.date.submitted 2007-07-09 en_US
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/10535/1294
dc.description.abstract "The objective of this paper is to analyse the present role of common property resources (CPRs) in a resource rich, mountainous environment, and to identify factors that influence their use. This study was based on an analysis of historical trends and 14 CPR case studies all over the country. "Bhutan is an exceptional case in South Asia. With its 72% forest cover, rich biodiversity and plentiful water resources, it can be considered as a resource rich environment. As Bhutan was quasi-isolated until the beginning of the 1960s, most land-users were highly dependent on the surrounding natural resources to meet their subsistence needs. This resulted into numerous CPRs all over the country. The most important common property resources in rural Bhutan are: forests, non-wood forest products (NWFP), pastures, water and agro-genetic resources. There were many indigenous agreed arrangements about the management and use of the CPRs, especially in areas where resources were more scarce and where some level of resource competition occurred. "During the last decades, the role and efficiency of these local arrangements has declined, due to increased pressure on natural resources, commercialisation of the local subsistence economy, a strong conservation policy and government control over natural resources (by the nationalisation of all non-privately owned land in 1969). In areas where mainstream cash crops became popular, CPRs became less important due to the cash crop focus and substitution of some CPR products. However, in remote and economically less developed areas, CPRs became more important to sustain rural livelihoods due to commoditization of certain common property natural resources. In 2001, the status of the CPRs in Bhutan is mixed. Sustainable use or degradation of CPRs depend on a complex combination of factors. The most important factors are: presence (or absence) of locally agreed arrangements, legal status of the CPRs, method of commercialisation, and government regulation and facilitation." en_US
dc.language English en_US
dc.subject IASC en_US
dc.subject common pool resources en_US
dc.subject resource management en_US
dc.subject natural resources en_US
dc.subject economic development en_US
dc.subject rural development en_US
dc.title Role and Use of Common Property Resources (CPRs) in Bhutan Himalayas: Between Tradition and Globalisation en_US
dc.type Conference Paper en_US
dc.type.published unpublished en_US
dc.coverage.region Middle East & South Asia en_US
dc.coverage.country Bhutan en_US
dc.subject.sector Social Organization en_US
dc.subject.sector General & Multiple Resources en_US
dc.identifier.citationconference Tradition and Globalisation: Critical Issues for the Accommodation of CPRs in the Pacific Region, the Inaugural Pacific Regional Meeting of the International Association for the Study of Common Property en_US
dc.identifier.citationconfdates September 2-4, 2001 en_US
dc.identifier.citationconfloc Brisbane, Australia en_US
dc.submitter.email lwisen@indiana.edu en_US


Files in this item

Files Size Format View
turkelboom.pdf 591.0Kb PDF View/Open

This item appears in the following document type(s)

Show simple item record