hidden
Image Database Export Citations

Menu:

Preferences on the Landscape: How Much do Individual Values Matter?

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Kauneckis, Derek en_US
dc.contributor.author Novac, Christina en_US
dc.date.accessioned 2009-07-31T14:38:45Z
dc.date.available 2009-07-31T14:38:45Z
dc.date.issued 2000 en_US
dc.date.submitted 2007-07-15 en_US
dc.date.submitted 2007-07-15 en_US
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/10535/1685
dc.description.abstract "Models of land-cover change have typically examined the phenomena on a regional scale. These models are often empirical driven and at best infer the motives driving individual actors. Those models examining the decisions of individual actors assume purely economic motives, with land cover understood purely as a factor in production. This paper seeks to explain the micro-level processes at work in determining land cover change. It accepts that economic incentives and conditions are important, but that there may be important differences in the preferences of a population that explain the variation observed across a landscape. The analysis concerns landowners values and use of forest cover and how they interact interaction with the characteristics of individual private parcels to affect land cover. Using a multinomial logit, it examines the impact of parcel size, agricultural use, the length of ownership, existing rules affecting land use, the presence of a residence, as well as landowners valuation of forest resources on the change in forest cover on a parcel from 1972 to 1997. Of these variables, parcel size, agricultural use and length of ownership were all found to be significant at a 0.05 level. Landowner valuation of forest cover was weakly significant at a 0.13 level. Of the factors examined here, parcel size had the greatest effect on forest cover change. Surprisingly, smaller sized parcels (< 40 acres) had the highest probability of having experienced a net forest gain during the study period. As expected, parcels with a larger percent of area under agriculture had a higher probability of having experienced a net forest loss than did parcels with a smaller percent of area under agriculture. The most interesting result is the effect of individual landowners preferences. While they affect the likelihood that a parcel had experienced a change in forest cover in the past, they did not determine the direction of that change. It was equally likely for parcels with landowners expressing strong forest conservation values to have experienced net forest loss or gain. The results lead to interesting implications for a theory of the causes and impact of land cover change in industrial societies." en_US
dc.language English en_US
dc.subject IASC en_US
dc.subject common pool resources en_US
dc.subject land tenure and use--models en_US
dc.subject land tenure and use en_US
dc.subject satellite image analysis en_US
dc.subject remote sensing en_US
dc.subject preference en_US
dc.subject environmental change--models en_US
dc.subject Workshop en_US
dc.subject CIPEC en_US
dc.title Preferences on the Landscape: How Much do Individual Values Matter? en_US
dc.type Conference Paper en_US
dc.coverage.region North America en_US
dc.subject.sector Land Tenure & Use en_US
dc.identifier.citationconference Constituting the Commons: Crafting Sustainable Commons in the New Millennium, the Eighth Biennial Conference of the International Association for the Study of Common Property en_US
dc.identifier.citationconfdates May 31-June 4 en_US
dc.identifier.citationconfloc Bloomington, Indiana, USA en_US
dc.submitter.email hess@indiana.edu en_US


Files in this item

Files Size Format View
kauneckisd060500.pdf 102.1Kb PDF View/Open

This item appears in the following document type(s)

Show simple item record