Image Database Export Citations


Socially Responsible Commercial Property Entities and the Allocation of Cultural Space

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Kimmet, Philip en_US
dc.date.accessioned 2009-07-31T14:38:53Z
dc.date.available 2009-07-31T14:38:53Z
dc.date.issued 2003 en_US
dc.date.submitted 2007-07-08 en_US
dc.date.submitted 2007-07-08 en_US
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/10535/1702
dc.description.abstract "When we talk about traditional or indigenous land use and economy, seldom do we think of the contemporary corporate and administrative jungle we call the central business district. Nevertheless, the built environment of our city centres are a great place to start rekindling our cultural past for several reasons. They have a high profile, their frequented, worked-in, and increasingly lived in by local populations and tourists, they are highly accessible and are destinations in their own right, and they are strong identity builders. Above all, CBDs are hives of commercial activity, and this has implications for the new 'corporate social responsibility.' This ethos, which many CEOs and government ministers are beginning to subscribe to, is impacting on the way commercial buildings in particular are designed, marketed and managed. This has given rise to the notion of 'socially responsible commercial property entities' (SRCPEs). However, much is unclear about what this term might mean for our cityscapes, and the original and current inhabitants in particular. This paper aims to demystify the term, and argues that despite the importance placed on the protection of private property rights, the notion of SRCPE can help to bring society, culture and history back into corporate and public administration calculations. In other words, making the community a meaningful stakeholder arguably forfeits certain property rights that have conventionally been vested within private domains. Releasing ground floor space for cultural purposes for instance would be a significant step toward returning cityspace to traditional custodians. In the very least, the emergence of SRCPE inspired social metrics should help to make these often alienating places a little more culturally sensitive and user friendly." en_US
dc.language English en_US
dc.subject IASC en_US
dc.subject urban affairs--case studies en_US
dc.subject business and finance en_US
dc.subject public administration en_US
dc.subject property rights en_US
dc.subject culture en_US
dc.subject indigenous institutions en_US
dc.title Socially Responsible Commercial Property Entities and the Allocation of Cultural Space en_US
dc.type Conference Paper en_US
dc.type.published unpublished en_US
dc.coverage.region Pacific and Australia en_US
dc.coverage.country Australia en_US
dc.subject.sector Social Organization en_US
dc.subject.sector Urban Commons en_US
dc.identifier.citationconference Traditional Lands in the Pacific Region: Indigenous Common Property Resources in Convulsion or Cohesion en_US
dc.identifier.citationconfdates September 7-9, 2003 en_US
dc.identifier.citationconfloc Brisbane, Australia en_US
dc.submitter.email lwisen@indiana.edu en_US

Files in this item

Files Size Format View
kimmet_-SRCPE_and_space.pdf 172.7Kb PDF View/Open

This item appears in the following document type(s)

Show simple item record