|
PDF
|
Type:
|
Journal Article |
Author:
|
Sarkar, Sahotra; Garson, Justin |
Journal:
|
Conservation and Society |
Volume:
|
2 |
Page(s):
|
|
Date:
|
2004 |
URI:
|
https://hdl.handle.net/10535/2503
|
Sector:
|
Theory Forestry |
Region:
|
North America South America |
Subject(s):
|
protected areas--theory networks--theory decision making--theory
|
Abstract:
|
"This article shows how a standard technique from multiple-criteria decision making, the computation of non-dominated alternative sets, can be adapted to incorporate non-biological criteria such as socio-political ones during the design of bio-diversity conservation area networks. There are three chief advantages of this approach: (a) unlike almost all other methods for incorporating multiple criteria in decision making, this technique avoids making arbitrary utility assignments to alternative; (b) it only requires comparative rankings of alternatives under the criteria to be synchronized; and (c) it often results in several alternative of equal status, leaving a further choice to be made by political decision-making bodies. This allows those bodies to bring into consideration criteria that cannot be satisfactorily formally modeled. The use of this method demonstrated using a data set from Texas, one from Ecuador and two artificially constructed data sets."
|