hidden
Image Database Export Citations

Menu:

Sustainability and Common-Pool Resources: Alternatives to Tragedy

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Carpenter, Stanley R. en_US
dc.date.accessioned 2009-07-31T14:52:59Z
dc.date.available 2009-07-31T14:52:59Z
dc.date.issued 2000 en_US
dc.date.submitted 2008-12-08 en_US
dc.date.submitted 2008-12-08 en_US
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/10535/2717
dc.description.abstract "The paradox that individually rational actions collectively can lead to irrational outcomes is exemplified in human appropriation of a class of goods known as 'common-pool resources' (CPR): natural or humanly created resource systems which are large enough to make it costly to exclude potential beneficiaries. Appropriations of common-pool resources for private use tend toward abusive practices that lead to the loss of the resource in question: the tragedy of the commons. Prescriptions for escape from tragedy have involved two institutions, each applied largely in isolation from the other: private markets (the 'hidden hand') and government coercion (Leviathan). Yet examples exist of local institutions that have utilized mixtures of public and private practices and have survived for hundreds of years. "Two problems further exacerbate efforts to avoid the tragic nature of common-pool resource use. One, given the current level of knowledge, the role of the resource is not recognized for what it is. It is, thus, in a fundamental, epistemological sense invisible. Two, if the resource is recognized, it may not be considered scarce, thus placing it outside the scrutiny of economic theory. Both types of error are addressed by the emerging field of ecological economics. "This paper discusses common pool resources, locates the ambiguities that make their identification difficult, and argues that avoidance of a CPR loss is inadequately addressed by sharply separated market and state institutions. When the resource is recognized for what it is, a common-pool good, which is subject to overexploitation, it may be possible to identify creative combinations of public and private institutions that can combine to save that resource. Disparate examples of self-organized enterprises, public/private utilities, and 'green' taxes, to name a few, provide empirical content for developing theories of self-organized collective action." en_US
dc.subject common pool resources--theory en_US
dc.subject collective action en_US
dc.subject institutions en_US
dc.subject self-organization en_US
dc.subject public--private en_US
dc.subject tragedy of the commons en_US
dc.subject Ostrom, Elinor en_US
dc.title Sustainability and Common-Pool Resources: Alternatives to Tragedy en_US
dc.type Journal Article en_US
dc.type.published published en_US
dc.subject.sector Theory en_US
dc.identifier.citationjournal Society for Philosophy and Technology en_US
dc.identifier.citationvolume 3 en_US
dc.identifier.citationnumber 4 en_US
dc.identifier.citationmonth September en_US
dc.submitter.email efcastle@indiana.edu en_US


Files in this item

Files Size Format View
CARPENTE.pdf 53.42Kb PDF View/Open

This item appears in the following document type(s)

Show simple item record