Image Database Export Citations


Challenges in Community-Research Relationships: Learning from Natural Science in Nunavut

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Gearheard, Shari en_US
dc.contributor.author Shirley, Jamal en_US
dc.date.accessioned 2009-07-31T14:53:14Z
dc.date.available 2009-07-31T14:53:14Z
dc.date.issued 2007 en_US
dc.date.submitted 2009-02-23 en_US
dc.date.submitted 2009-02-23 en_US
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/10535/2738
dc.description.abstract "The context and conduct of Arctic research are changing. In Nunavut, funding agencies, licensing bodies, and new regulatory agencies established under the Nunavut Land Claims Agreement require researchers to engage and consult with Inuit communities during all phases of research, to provide local training and other benefits, and to communicate project results effectively. Researchers are also increasingly expected to incorporate traditional knowledge into their work and to design studies that are relevant to local interests and needs. In this paper, we explore the challenges that researchers and communities experience in meeting these requirements by reviewing case studies of three natural science projects in Nunavut. Together, these projects exemplify both success and failure in negotiating research relationships. The case studies highlight three principal sources of researcher-community conflict: 1) debate surrounding acceptable impacts of research and the nature and extent of local benefits that research projects can and should provide; 2) uncertainty over who has the power and authority to dictate terms and conditions under which projects should be licensed; and 3) the appropriate research methodology and design to balance local expectations and research needs. The Nunavut research licensing process under the Scientists Act is an important opportunity for communities, scientists, and regulatory agencies to negotiate power relationships. However, the standards and procedures used to evaluate research impact remain unclear, as does the role of communities in the decision-making process for research licensing. The case studies also demonstrate the critical role of trust and rapport, forged through early and frequent communication, efforts to provide local training, and opportunities for community members to observe, participate in, and derive employment from project activities. Clarifying research policies in Nunavut is one step to improving relations between scientists and communities. In addition, steps need to be taken at both policy and project levels to train researchers, educate funding programs, mobilize institutions, and empower communities, thus strengthening the capacity of all stakeholders in northern research." en_US
dc.subject research en_US
dc.subject participatory development en_US
dc.subject science en_US
dc.subject Inuit (North American people) en_US
dc.subject indigenous institutions en_US
dc.subject traditional knowledge en_US
dc.title Challenges in Community-Research Relationships: Learning from Natural Science in Nunavut en_US
dc.type Journal Article en_US
dc.type.published published en_US
dc.coverage.region North America en_US
dc.coverage.country Canada en_US
dc.subject.sector Social Organization en_US
dc.subject.sector Information & Knowledge en_US
dc.identifier.citationjournal Arctic en_US
dc.identifier.citationvolume 60 en_US
dc.identifier.citationnumber 1 en_US
dc.identifier.citationmonth March en_US

Files in this item

Files Size Format View
Arctic60-1-62.pdf 84.06Kb PDF View/Open

This item appears in the following document type(s)

Show simple item record