|
Abstract:
|
"This paper presents a framework to understand how conservation, in particular protected areas and national parks, are resisted, based on theories of subaltern politics and a review of thirty-four published case studies. It is informed largely by Scotts concept of everyday resistance, which considers the informal subtle politics involved in social conflicts where there are constraints on the ability of some people to take open, formal action. These ideas are critiqued and adapted to the particular context of conservation regulation, which is distinct from many other types of rural conflict. In particular, it recognises the importance of continuing banned livelihood practices such as hunting or farming in resistance, and the particular symbolism this has in conflicts. It also shows the importance of not just social factors in these conflicts, but also the role of physical properties of natural resources in determining the form of resistance. As well as the theoretical contribution, by showing the variety of responses to this resistance this paper aims to make conservation practitioners more aware of the forms local resistance can take. Rather than being a simple call for a more socially just conservation, it goes beyond this to provide a tool to make conservation better for both local communities and biodiversity."
|