| dc.contributor.author |
Tyson, Wayne |
en_US |
| dc.date.accessioned |
2009-07-31T14:54:52Z |
|
| dc.date.available |
2009-07-31T14:54:52Z |
|
| dc.date.issued |
2002 |
en_US |
| dc.date.submitted |
2008-11-06 |
en_US |
| dc.date.submitted |
2008-11-06 |
en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri |
https://hdl.handle.net/10535/2888 |
|
| dc.description.abstract |
"I believe that Sandhu (2001) is seriously misreading Holling (1999). Holling's sculpting analogy concerned the process, not the product. This lack of precision is a problem with metaphorical writing, and I don't pretend to be so wise as to understand the phenomenon. However, I will attempt to both defend and clarify Holling, at least as I interpret his point. I do this not to nitpick (an example of a metaphorical word intended to illuminate rather than obscure), but because the distinction is far from trivial. It is, in fact, crucial." |
en_US |
| dc.subject |
natural resources |
en_US |
| dc.subject |
resource management |
en_US |
| dc.title |
Crucial Distinctions: Process and Product: A response to: Sandhu. 2001. 'Fixed Visions and Visionaries' |
en_US |
| dc.type |
Journal Article |
en_US |
| dc.type.published |
published |
en_US |
| dc.subject.sector |
Social Organization |
en_US |
| dc.identifier.citationjournal |
Ecology and Society |
en_US |
| dc.identifier.citationvolume |
5 |
en_US |
| dc.identifier.citationnumber |
2 |
en_US |
| dc.identifier.citationmonth |
January |
en_US |