|
|
|
PDF
|
|
Type:
|
Journal Article |
|
Author:
|
De Cremer, David; Van Vugt, Mark |
|
Journal:
|
Current Research in Social Psychology |
|
Volume:
|
3 |
|
Page(s):
|
|
|
Date:
|
1998 |
|
URI:
|
https://hdl.handle.net/10535/3000
|
|
Sector:
|
Social Organization |
|
Region:
|
|
|
Subject(s):
|
collective action
citizen participatory management
cooperation
public goods and bads
|
|
Abstract:
|
"According to Self-Categorization Theory people may define their self-concept in terms of collective identity when engaged in intergroup comparisons and in terms of personal identity when engaged in interpersonal comparisons. This difference in level of categorization (collective versus personal identity) is believed to affect the extent people identify with their group and subsequently their behavior in social dilemma situations. The present study investigates whether people contribute more in a public goods dilemma when collective identity is made salient than when personal identity is made salient, and further which processes may underlie this behavioral effect. Results revealed that people identified more strongly with the collective and contributed more when collective identity was made salient compared to when personal identity was made salient. Furthermore, this behavioral effect seemed to be mediated by perceptions of self-efficacy rather than by perceptions of the trustworthiness of peoples' fellow group members."
|