hidden
Image Database Export Citations

Menu:

Relocation from Wildlife Reserves in the Greater and Trans-Himalayas: Is it Necessary?

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Bhatnagar, Yash Veer en_US
dc.date.accessioned 2009-07-31T14:58:10Z
dc.date.available 2009-07-31T14:58:10Z
dc.date.issued 2008 en_US
dc.date.submitted 2009-05-14 en_US
dc.date.submitted 2009-05-14 en_US
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/10535/3181
dc.description.abstract "The Greater and Trans-Himalayan tracts are cold deserts that have severe seasonal and resource scarce environments. Covering the bulk of Indian Himalayas, they are a rich repository of biodiversity values and ecosystem services. The region has a large protected area (PA) network which has not been com-pletely effective in conserving these unique values. The human population densities are much lower (usually < 1 per sq km) than in most other parts of the country (over 300 to a sq km). However, even such small populations can come into conflict with strict PA laws that demand large inviolate areas, which can mainly be achieved through relocation of the scattered settlements. In this paper, I reason that in this landscape relocation is not a tenable strategy for conservation due to a variety of reasons. The primary ones are that wildlife, including highly endangered ones are pervasive in the larger landscape (unlike the habitat 'islands' of the forested ecosystems) and existing large PAs usually encompass only a small pro-portion of this range. Similarly, traditional use by people for marginal cultivation, biomass extraction and pastoralism is also as pervasive in this landscape. There does exist pockets of conflict and these are prob-ably increasing owing to a variety of changes relating to modernisation. However, scarce resources, the lack of alternatives and the traditional practice of clear-cut division of all usable areas and pastures be-tween communities make resettlement of people outside PAs extremely difficult. It is reasoned that given the widespread nature of the wildlife and pockets of relatively high density, it is important to prioritise these smaller areas for conservation in a scenario where they form a mosaic of small 'cores' that are more effectively maintained with local support and that enable wildlife to persist. These ideas have recently gained widespread acceptance in both government and conservation circles and may soon become part of national strategy for these areas." en_US
dc.subject wildlife en_US
dc.subject Himalayas en_US
dc.subject protected areas en_US
dc.subject conservation en_US
dc.title Relocation from Wildlife Reserves in the Greater and Trans-Himalayas: Is it Necessary? en_US
dc.type Journal Article en_US
dc.type.published published en_US
dc.coverage.region Middle East & South Asia en_US
dc.coverage.country India en_US
dc.subject.sector Wildlife en_US
dc.identifier.citationjournal Conservation and Society en_US
dc.identifier.citationvolume 6 en_US
dc.identifier.citationnumber 3 en_US
dc.identifier.citationmonth January en_US


Files in this item

Files Size Format View
cs-6-3-263[1].pdf 58.67Kb PDF View/Open

This item appears in the following document type(s)

Show simple item record