|
|
|
PDF
|
|
Type:
|
Working Paper |
|
Author:
|
Spierenburg, Marja; Steenkamp, Conrad; Wels, Harry |
|
Date:
|
2007 |
|
Agency:
|
World Resources Institute, Washington, DC |
|
Series:
|
Representation, Equity and Environement Working Paper: WP #26 |
|
URI:
|
https://hdl.handle.net/10535/4535
|
|
Sector:
|
General & Multiple Resources |
|
Region:
|
Africa |
|
Subject(s):
|
conservation
citizen participatory management
resource management
|
|
Abstract:
|
"The Great Limpopo is one of the largest TransFrontier Conservation Areas (TFCAs) in the world, encompassing vast areas in South Africa, Zimbabwe, and Mozambique. By arguing that residents living in or close to the TFCA will participate in its management and benefit economically, TFCA proponents claim social legitimacy for the project. The establishment of the Great Limpopo required negotiations among the three nation states, different government departments within these states, and various donors contributing funds. This paper explores how these negotiations and interactions affected the institutional choices made with regards to the management of the Great Limpopo and how these shaped the control and benefits of local residents. This paper examines the differences among the different actors in terms of power and capacities, which are often ignored in the promotion of TFCAs. By comparing the experiences of local residents in the South African part of the TFCA with those in Mozambique the cases show how international negotiations interact with national policies of decentralization to shape and sometimes even disable local government institutions."
|