hidden
Image Database Export Citations

Menu:

Some Missing Elements in the Quebec Constitutional Debate

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Sabetti, Filippo
dc.date.accessioned 2009-09-09T19:00:12Z
dc.date.available 2009-09-09T19:00:12Z
dc.date.issued no date en_US
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/10535/4803
dc.description.abstract "Whether the constitutional and political future of Quebec and the rest of Canada will take on radically different sovereignist turns, or fall back on the status quo, it will not be for a lack of talks, public symposia and reports of one kind or another. Yet for all these talks and activities, there has been little or no public debate informed by covenant theory, and its relation to the Canadian admixture of federal principles with a parliamentary, majoritarian system. This is the missing element in the constitutional debate. From both a sovereignist or status quo position, serious consideration of covenant theory and its relation to Canadian federal arrangements is not important. Indeed, the logic of each position requires not to address this issue. But any attempt at creating or recreating self-rule and shared rule among ourselves — in Quebec as in Canada — must of necessity address or be concerned with this question. This is what I wish to argue here." en_US
dc.language English en_US
dc.subject constitution en_US
dc.subject Workshop en_US
dc.title Some Missing Elements in the Quebec Constitutional Debate en_US
dc.type Working Paper en_US
dc.type.methodology Case Study en_US
dc.coverage.region North America en_US
dc.coverage.country Canada en_US
dc.subject.sector History en_US
dc.subject.sector Social Organization en_US


Files in this item

Files Size Format View
Some missing el ... constitutional debate.pdf 41.03Kb PDF View/Open

This item appears in the following document type(s)

Show simple item record