Image Database Export Citations


Voting on Allocation Rules in a Commons Without Face-to-Face Communication: Theoretical Issues and Experimental Results

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Walker, James M.
dc.contributor.author Gardner, Roy
dc.contributor.author Ostrom, Elinor
dc.contributor.author Herr, Andrew
dc.date.accessioned 2009-11-30T19:44:40Z
dc.date.available 2009-11-30T19:44:40Z
dc.date.issued 1995 en_US
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/10535/5239
dc.description.abstract "An immense outpouring of empirical studies has been published during the past decade focusing on the norms and rules that have evolved or been chosen to govern smaller, relatively homogeneous common-pool resources. In many field settings, the tragedy of the commons has been avoided and robust institutions have been used to govern fragile common-pool resources for several centuries. Empirical studies of existing field settings, while crucial for establishing external validity, are not immune to four threats to establishing a firm explanation of observed cooperative behavior. First, scholars can rarely obtain quantitative data about the potential benefits that could be achieved if participants cooperate at an optimal level or about the level of inefficiency yielded when they act independently. Second, it is thus difficult to determine how much improvement has been achieved as contrasted to the same setting without particular institutions in place. Third, without using expensive time series designs, studies only include those resources that have survived; and, the proportion of similar cases that did not survive is unknown. Fourth, many variables differ from one case to the next. This means a large number of cases is required to gain statistical control of the relative importance of diverse variables. In this regard, the few studies that have attempted cross sectional control using a relatively large number of field cases have produced important results that complement individual case studies." en_US
dc.language English en_US
dc.subject game theory en_US
dc.subject common pool resources--models en_US
dc.subject Workshop en_US
dc.subject voting en_US
dc.subject communication en_US
dc.subject trust en_US
dc.title Voting on Allocation Rules in a Commons Without Face-to-Face Communication: Theoretical Issues and Experimental Results en_US
dc.type Conference Paper en_US
dc.type.published unpublished en_US
dc.type.methodology Case Study en_US
dc.subject.sector Theory en_US
dc.identifier.citationconference Game Theory in the Behavioral Sciences en_US
dc.identifier.citationconfdates October 11-12, 1995 en_US
dc.identifier.citationconfloc Tuscon, AZ en_US

Files in this item

Files Size Format View
Walker--Voting ... to face communication.pdf 561.2Kb PDF View/Open

This item appears in the following document type(s)

Show simple item record