dc.contributor.author |
Thomas, Stephen J. |
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2010-02-24T18:20:39Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2010-02-24T18:20:39Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
1992 |
en_US |
dc.identifier.uri |
https://hdl.handle.net/10535/5604 |
|
dc.description.abstract |
"This paper seeks to identify some of the contradictions which abound in discussions of equity and benefit when related to wildlife; contradictions which exist because wildlife is one of the few CPRs with the capacity to inflict costs, both tangible and intangible. Examples are given of a variety of approaches being adopted in various districts which have been granted the authority to manage their wildlife. The question is asked whether such approaches will satisfy beneficiaries' needs effectively." |
en_US |
dc.language |
English |
en_US |
dc.subject |
wildlife |
en_US |
dc.subject |
indigenous institutions |
en_US |
dc.subject |
equity |
en_US |
dc.subject |
CAMPFIRE |
en_US |
dc.subject |
IASC |
en_US |
dc.title |
Equity in CAMPFIRE: Wildlife as a Communal Property Resource in Zimbabwe |
en_US |
dc.type |
Conference Paper |
en_US |
dc.type.published |
unpublished |
en_US |
dc.type.methodology |
Case Study |
en_US |
dc.coverage.region |
Africa |
en_US |
dc.coverage.country |
Zimbabwe |
en_US |
dc.subject.sector |
Wildlife |
en_US |
dc.identifier.citationconference |
Inequality and the Commons, the Third Biennial Conference of the International Association for the Study of Common Property |
en_US |
dc.identifier.citationconfdates |
September 17-20, 1992 |
en_US |
dc.identifier.citationconfloc |
Washington, DC |
en_US |